Integrative Biology Journals

JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 1-.DOI: 10.1007/s11676-026-02059-2

• Original Paper •    

Explaining annual gross primary productivity through climatic variables by integrating key vegetation functional traits

Hanliang Gui1, Jia Sun2, Zhenhua Xiong3, Wei Wu4, Qinchuan Xin3, Peng Zhu5, Xuewen Zhou3, Yujie Li3, Xiaoyou Chen   

  1. 1School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, People’s Republic of China

    2Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Ecology and Environmental Change, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, People’s Republic of China

    3School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, People’s Republic of China 

    4Mining College, Guizhou University, Guizhou 550025, People’s Republic of China 

    5Department of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, People’s Republic of China

  • Received:2025-09-07 Accepted:2026-02-09 Online:2026-05-12 Published:2026-01-01
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the Open Fund of Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Ecology and Environmental Change (grant nos.REEC OF 202504) and National Natural Science Foundation of China ( grant nos. 42371483 and 42401573

Abstract: Vegetation gross primary production (GPP), the rate of carbon assimilation via photosynthesis, is a fundamental metric for assessing terrestrial carbon uptake. Functional traits such as the carbon uptake period and maximum photosynthetic capacity (GPPmax) largely determine interannual GPP variability, yet existing frameworks are mainly effective in ecosystems with idealized bell-shaped GPP trajectories. This gap highlights the need for a globally consistent framework that accounts for biome-specific differences. We developed the trait-based ecosystem productivity explanatory model (TEPEM) to disentangle and explain the empirical relationship between total annual GPP (GPPann) and vegetation functional traits, particularly GPPmax and the annual average growing season index (GSIann). This relationship proved to be remarkably robust across biomes (r = 0.93, p < 0.01) based on flux tower observations. Building on it, we further integrated the light response curve model to dynamically simulate GPPmax, enabling TEPEM to estimate GPPann across historical and future climate scenarios. Site-scale evaluations demonstrated the strong performance of TEPEM, with a Pearson’s r of 0.86 and a low root mean square error of 333.8 g m−2 a−1. At the global scale, TEPEM effectively reproduces the spatiotemporal patterns of GPPann across diverse biomes, achieving Pearson’s r values ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 compared to process-based, light use efficiency, and upscaling models. TEPEM projects increasing GPPann trends across most terrestrial regions by 2100 under various shared socioeconomic pathways. This study underscores the critical role of vegetation functional traits, particularly phenology and photosynthetic capacity, in explaining GPP variability.

Key words: Interannual variability in gross primary productivity, Growing season index, Seasonal maximum of gross primary production, Terrestrial ecosystem model, Climate change