Bulletin of Botanical Research ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 613-625.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2026.04.004
• Original Paper • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xiaoke HU1, Chenglin YUAN2,3(
), Xiaona QIU1, Zhaokang AN2,3, Na LI2, Fanglin WANG1
Received:2026-02-21
Online:2026-07-20
Published:2026-07-22
Contact:
Chenglin YUAN
E-mail:yuanchenglin23@mails.ucas.ac.cn
CLC Number:
Xiaoke HU, Chenglin YUAN, Xiaona QIU, Zhaokang AN, Na LI, Fanglin WANG. Coordinated Adaptation Mechanism of Hydraulic Safety and Thermal Tolerance in Five Tamarix Species[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2026, 46(4): 613-625.
Table 1
Population characteristics of five Tamarix species
物种 Species | 株数 Plants | 冠幅(东西向) Crown width (E-W)/m | 冠幅(南北向) Crown width (N-S)/m | 株高 Height/m | 基径 Basal diameter/cm | 枯枝率 Dead branch rate/% | 死亡率 Mortality rate/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
多花柽柳 T.hohenackeri | 15 | 1.78±0.02a | 1.50±0.04a | 1.71±0.03a | 3.30±0.03a | 45.97±0.89a | 20.00 |
长穗柽柳 T.elongata | 13 | 1.70±0.03a | 1.37±0.03ab | 1.69±0.01ab | 3.08±0.03b | 39.79±0.56b | 15.38 |
多枝柽柳 T.ramosissima | 13 | 1.57±0.03b | 1.45±0.04ab | 1.60±0.01c | 2.81±0.02c | 32.49±0.51c | 7.69 |
短穗柽柳 T.laxa | 12 | 1.38±0.03c | 1.34±0.03b | 1.42±0.02d | 2.62±0.05d | 25.86±0.65d | 0 |
刚毛柽柳 T.hispida | 12 | 1.43±0.03c | 1.34±0.02b | 1.61±0.02bc | 2.45±0.05e | 15.29±0.92e | 0 |
Fig.2
Key hydraulic traits and hydraulic safety margins of five Tamarix speciesA. Water potential at 50% loss of hydraulic conductivity(P50); B. Hydraulic safety margin(HSM); C. Saturated osmotic potential(Ψsat); D. Turgor loss point(Ψtlp). Data were means±SE(n=6); different lowercase letters indicated significant differences among species(P<0.05).
Fig.3
Thermal tolerance, transpiration cooling capacity, and gas exchange parameters of five Tamarix speciesA. Semi-lethal high temperature(LT50); B. Maximum net photosynthetic rate(Pn,max); C. Maximum stomatal conductance(Gs,max); D. Maximum transpiration rate(Tr,max); E. Maximum transpiration cooling effect(∆Tmax). Data were presented as means±SE(n=6), except for ∆Tmax; different lowercase letters indicated significant differences among species(P<0.05).
Fig.4
Diurnal dynamics of leaf gas exchange,water potential,and temperature traits in five Tamarix speciesA. Stomatal conductance(Gs); B. Leaf water potential(Ψleaf); C. Leaf temperature(Tleaf); D. Difference between leaf and air temperature(∆T); data points represented the means of six biological replicates.
Fig.5
Relationships between thermal tolerance and hydr-aulic traits across five Tamarix speciesA. Linear regression between LT50 and P50; B. Linear regression between LT50 and Ψtlp; C. Linear regression between LT50 and HSM. Different colored points represented different Tamarix species, the shaded area represented the 95% confidence interval.
Fig.6
Principal component analysis of physiological adaptive strategies in five Tamarix species based on hydraulic and thermal traitsArrows indicated the loading direction and magnitude of physiological traits; colored points represented different Tamarix species. PC1 and PC2 explained 92.4% and 4.9% of the total variation, respectively.
| [1] | Allen C D, Macalady A K, Chenchouni H,et al.A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2010,259(4):660-684. |
| [2] | Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A,et al.Climate change 2021:The physical science basis:Working Group I contribution to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[R].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2021. |
| [3] | Adams H D, Zeppel M J B, Anderegg W R L,et al.A multi-species synthesis of physiological mechanisms in drought-induced tree mortality[J].Nature Ecology & Evolution,2017,1(9):1285-1291. |
| [4] | Suzuki N, Rivero R M, Shulaev V,et al.Abiotic and biotic stress combinations[J].New Phytologist,2014,203(1):32-43. |
| [5] | Guo J J, Gong X W, Li X H,et al.Coupled hydraulics and carbon economy underlie age-related growth decline and revitalisation of sand-fixing shrubs after crown removal[J].Plant,Cell & Environment,2024,47(8):2999-3014. |
| [6] | Anderegg W R L, Klein T, Bartlett M,et al.Meta-analysis reveals that hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns of drought-induced tree mortality across the globe[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2016,113(18):5024-5029. |
| [7] | Huo J Q, Li C Y, Zhao Y,et al.Hydraulic mechanism of limiting growth and maintaining survival of desert shrubs in arid habitats[J].Plant Physiology,2024,196(4):2450-2462. |
| [8] | Tyree M T, Sperry J S.Vulnerability of xylem to cavitation and embolism[J].Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,1989,40:19-36. |
| [9] | Choat B, Brodribb T J, Brodersen C R,et al.Triggers of tree mortality under drought[J].Nature,2018,558(7711):531-539. |
| [10] | Sperry J S, Venturas M D, Anderegg W R L,et al.Predicting stomatal responses to the environment from the optimization of photosynthetic gain and hydraulic cost[J].Plant,Cell & Environment,2017,40(6):816-830. |
| [11] | Cox D, Marchin R M, Ellsworth D S,et al.Thermal safety margins and peak leaf temperatures predict vulnerability of diverse plant species to an experimental heatwave[J/OL].Plant,Cell & Environment,2025-06-29. . |
| [12] | Mitchell D, Schönbeck L, Shah S,et al.Leaf drought and heat tolerance are integrated across three temperate biome types[J].Scientific Reports,2025,15:12201. |
| [13] | Drake J E, Tjoelker M G, Vårhammar A,et al.Trees tolerate an extreme heatwave via sustained transpirational cooling and increased leaf thermal tolerance[J].Global Change Biology,2018,24(6):2390-2402. |
| [14] | Lin H, Chen Y J, Zhang H L,et al.Stronger cooling effects of transpiration and leaf physical traits of plants from a hot dry habitat than from a hot wet habitat[J].Functional Ecology,2017,31(12):2202-2211. |
| [15] | Wang Y S D, Zhang J L, Chen Y J,et al.Leaf economic traits link drought and heat tolerance of woody species in two contrasting hydrothermal habitats[J].New Phytologist,2026,249(6):2808-2820. |
| [16] | Bartlett M K, Scoffoni C, Sack L.The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes:a global meta-analysis[J].Ecology Letters,2012,15(5):393-405. |
| [17] | Guo J J, Gong X W, Hao G Y.Leaf transpirational cooling and thermal tolerance vary along the spectrum of iso-anisohydric stomatal regulation in sand-fixing shrubs[J].Plant,Cell & Environment,2025,48(3):2053-2066. |
| [18] | Gong X W, Leigh A, Guo J J,et al.Sand dune shrub species prioritize hydraulic integrity over transpirational cooling during an experimental heatwave[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2023,336:109483. |
| [19] | Gries D, Zeng F, Foetzki A,et al.Growth and water relations of Tamarix ramosissima and Populus euphratica on Taklamakan desert dunes in relation to depth to a permanent water table[J].Plant,Cell & Environment,2003, 26(5):725-736. |
| [20] | 木巴热克·阿尤普,荆卫民,伊丽米努尔,等.柽柳属6种植物侧枝木质部导水率与纹孔数量特征关系[J].西北林学院学报,2017,32(2):106-111. |
| Ayup Mubarek, Jing Weimin,Yiliminuer,et al.Relations between xylem hydraulic efficiency and inter-vessel pit features of six Tamarix L. species[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2017,32(2):106-111. | |
| [21] | 王红宝,郑伶杰,丁丁,等.7种柽柳属植物对NaCl胁迫的生长生理响应与耐盐性差异[J].山东农业科学,2022,54(11):31-38. |
| Wang Hongbao, Zheng Lingjie, Ding Ding,et al.Growth and physiological response to NaCl stress and salt tolerance differences of seven Tamarix Linn. species[J].Shandong Agricultural Sciences,2022,54(11):31-38. | |
| [22] | 李彩霞,兰海燕.荒漠植物柽柳抗逆机制的研究进展[J].生物技术通报,2021,37(5):128-140. |
| Li Caixia, Lan Haiyan.Research progress in the stress tolerance mechanisms of desert plant Tamarix spp.[J].Biotechnology Bulletin,2021,37(5):128-140. | |
| [23] | 丁阔,张展.柽柳属植物研究进展[J].农村科学实验,2024(12):181-183. |
| Ding Kuo, Zhang Zhan.Research progress of Tamarix plants[J].Rural Scientific Experiment,2024(12):181- 183. | |
| [24] | Turner N C.Measurement of plant water status by the pressure chamber technique[J].Irrigation Science,1988, 9(4):289-308. |
| [25] | Schulte P J, Hinckley T M.A comparison of pressure-volume curve data analysis techniques[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,1985,36(171):1590-1602. |
| [26] | Alder N N, Pockman W T, Sperry J S,et al.Use of centrifugal force in the study of xylem cavitation[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,1997,48(308):665-674. |
| [27] | Sperry J S, Christman M A, Torres-Ruiz J M,et al.Vulnerability curves by centrifugation:is there an open vessel artefact,and are ‘r’ shaped curves necessarily invalid?[J].Plant,Cell & Environment,2012,35(3):601-610. |
| [28] | Knight C A, Ackerly D D.Evolution and plasticity of photosynthetic thermal tolerance,specific leaf area and leaf size:congeneric species from desert and coastal environments[J].New Phytologist,2003,160(2):337-347. |
| [29] | Fauset S, Freitas H C, Galbraith D R,et al.Differences in leaf thermoregulation and water use strategies between three co-occurring Atlantic forest tree species[J].Plant,Cell & Environment,2018,41(7):1618-1631. |
| [30] | Sack L, Ball M C, Brodersen C,et al.Plant hydraulics as a central hub integrating plant and ecosystem function:meeting report for ‘Emerging Frontiers in Plant Hydraulics’(Washington,DC,May 2015)[J].Plant,Cell & Environment,2016,39(9):2085-2094. |
| [31] | Martin-StPaul N, Delzon S, Cochard H.Plant resistance to drought depends on timely stomatal closure[J].Ecology Letters,2017,20(11):1437-1447. |
| [32] | Choat B, Jansen S, Brodribb T J,et al.Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought[J].Nature,2012,491(7426):752-755. |
| [33] | O’Sullivan O S, Heskel M A, Reich P B,et al.Thermal limits of leaf metabolism across biomes[J].Global Change Biology,2017,23(1):209-223. |
| [34] | Volaire F.A unified framework of plant adaptive strategies to drought:crossing scales and disciplines[J].Global Change Biology,2018,24(7):2929-2938. |
| [35] | Meinzer F C, Johnson D M, Lachenbruch B,et al.Xylem hydraulic safety margins in woody plants:coordination of stomatal control of xylem tension with hydraulic capacitance[J].Functional Ecology,2009,23(5):922-930. |
| [36] | Valladares F, Gianoli E, Gómez J M.Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity[J].New Phytologist,2007,176(4):749-763. |
| [37] | Skelton R P, West A G, Dawson T E.Predicting plant vulnerability to drought in biodiverse regions using functional traits[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2015,112(18):5744-5749. |
| [38] | Chesson P.Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,2000,31(2000):343-366. |
| [39] | Silvertown J, Araya Y, Gowing D.Hydrological niches in terrestrial plant communities:a review[J].Journal of Ecology,2015,103(1):93-108. |
| [40] | Gleason S M, Westoby M, Jansen S,et al.Weak tradeoff between xylem safety and xylem-specific hydraulic efficiency across the world’s woody plant species[J].New Phytologist,2016,209(1):123-136. |
| [41] | Kraft N J B, Godoy O, Levine J M.Plant functional traits and the multidimensional nature of species coexistence[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2015,112(3):797-802. |
| [42] | Wang X Y, Li Z S, Zhou X B,et al.Multi-dimensional adaptation strategies of a desert shrub seedling to drought gradient:integrated physiological,anatomical and hydraulic adjustments in Reaumuria songarica [J].Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,2025,227:110091. |
| [1] | Xiang WAN, Xiaoke HU, Ping WU, Fangyin HE, Shujuan LIU, Chenglin YUAN. Differences in Multidimensional Functional Traits of Haloxylon ammodendron after Different Stubble Treatments in a Desert-Oasis Ecotone [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2026, 46(4): 626-641. |
| [2] | ZHANG Qing, YU Rui-De, ZHENG Hong-Wei, YANG Mei-Lin, GAN Miao. Response Analysis of Larix sibirica to Climate Warming at Different Elevations in the Eastern Tianshan Mountains [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2018, 38(1): 14-25. |
| [3] | MA Chuang;ZHANG Wen-Hui;LIU Xin-Cheng*. Effects of Iso-osmotic Potential Salt and Water Stress on the Seed Germination of Periploca sepium Bge [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2008, 28(4): 465-470. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||