Bulletin of Botanical Research ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 266-276.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2025.02.012
• Original Paper • Previous Articles
Yaowen SUN1, Haifeng NAN2(), Xiaomin WANG3, Lang ZUO4, Ruohan NAN5
Received:
2024-10-04
Online:
2025-03-20
Published:
2025-04-07
Contact:
Haifeng NAN
E-mail:21062884@qq.com
CLC Number:
Yaowen SUN, Haifeng NAN, Xiaomin WANG, Lang ZUO, Ruohan NAN. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Heart Rot in Ancient Elm Trees in Hohhot[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2025, 45(2): 266-276.
Table 1
Survey index standard of ancient elm in Hohhot
指标类型 Indicator type | 调查指标 Survey indicator | 测量标准 Measurement standard |
---|---|---|
健康指标 Health indicators | 树皮损伤 Bark damage | 树干无损伤记为5;0~1/6树干周长损伤记为4;1/6~1/3树干周长损伤记为3;1/3~1/2树干周长损伤记为2;>1/2树干周长损伤记为1 No trunk damage was recorded as 5; 0-1/6 trunk circumference damage(TCD) was recorded as 4;1/6-1/3 TCD was recorded as 3;1/3-1/2 TCD was recorded as 2;>1/2 TCD was recorded as 1 |
主干病害 Trunk disease | 心腐检测处上下20 cm范围内,树干受害面积>75%记为1;树干受害>50%且≤75%记为2;树干受害>25%且≤50%记为3;树干受害>5%且≤25%记为4;树干受害≤5%记为5 Within 20 cm above and below the heart rot detection, trunk damage area(TDA)>75% was recorded as 1;TDA>50% and ≤75% was recorded as 2;TDA >25% and ≤50% was recorded as 3;TDA >5% and ≤25% was recorded as 4;TDA≤5% was recorded as 5 | |
主干虫害 Trunk pest | 心腐检测处上下20 cm范围内,树干受害面积>75%记为1;树干受害>50%且≤75%记为2;树干受害>25%且≤50%记为3;树干受害>5%且≤25%记为4;树干受害≤5%记为5 Within 20 cm above and below the heart rot detection, trunk damage area(TDA)>75% was recorded as 1;TDA >50% and ≤75% was recorded as 2;TDA >25% and ≤50% was recorded as 3;TDA >5% and ≤25% was recorded as 4;TDA ≤5% was recorded as 5 | |
形态指标 Morphological indicators | 主干倾斜角 Trunk tilt angle | 以林木树干主体与水平地面的夹角为准。树干倾斜角>30°记为1;树干倾斜角20°~30°记为2;树干倾斜角10°~20°记为3;树干倾斜角5°~10°记为4;树干倾斜角0°~5°记为5 The angle between the main body of the tree trunk and the horizontal ground was used. The trunk tilt angle (TTA)>30° was recorded as 1;TTA in 20°-30° was recorded as 2;TTA in 10°-20° was recorded as 3;TTA in 5°-10° was recorded as 4; TTA in 0°-5° was recorded as 5 |
冠形 Crown shape | 树冠不规则,树枝极为不均匀记为1;树冠缺失严重,枝叶分布凌乱记为2;树冠一定程度缺失,形状不规则记为3;树冠少许缺失,较为规则记为4;树冠均匀对称,冠形优美记为5 The crown was irregular and the branches were unevenly distributed,which was recorded as 1;the crown was seriously missing and the distribution of branches and leaves was messy,which was recorded as 2;the crown was missing to some extent and the shape was irregular,which was recorded as 3;the crown was missing a little and was more regular,which was recorded as 4;the crown was even and symmetrical and the crown was beautifully shaped,which was recorded as 5 | |
环境指标 Environmental indicators | 根系生长空间 Root growth space | 古树周围5 m以上无建筑物、水泥及其他硬化阻碍记为5;古树周围4~5 m有建筑物、水泥及其他硬化阻碍记为4;古树周围3~4 m有建筑物、水泥及其他硬化阻碍记为3;古树周围2~3 m有建筑物、水泥及其他硬化阻碍记为2;古树周围2 m之内有建筑物、水泥及其他硬化阻碍记为1 The case without buildings,cement and rocks around the tree for more than 5 m was recorded as 5;the case with buildings,cement and other hardened obstacles around the tree for 4-5 m was recorded as 4; for 3-4 m was recorded as 3;for 2-3 m was recorded as 2;the case with buildings,cement,and other hardened obstacles within 2 m around the tree was recorded as 1 |
树冠生长空间 Canopy growth space | 古树正常生长空间无限制记为5;能满足80%以上的生长空间记为4;能满足60%~80%的生长空间记为3;能满足30%~60%生长空间记为2;只能满足30%以下的生长空间记为1 The normal growth space of ancient trees without restriction was recorded as 5;that can meet more than 80% of the growth space was recorded as 4; that can meet 60%-80% was recorded as 3;that can meet 30%-60% was recorded as 2;that can only meet less than 30% was recorded as 1 | |
土壤紧实度 Soil compaction | 土壤疏松,稍加压力很容易使土块碎散记为5;较疏松,稍加压力便可将刀插入2~3 cm记为4;坚实,不用很大力可把刀插入土体2~3 cm记为3;较坚实,用很大力可把刀插入土体2~3 cm记为2;坚硬,用很大力也难把刀插入土体记为1 Soil was loose,which a little pressure was easy to make the soil fragmentation was recorded as 5;looser,which a little pressure could be inserted into the knife 2-3 cm was recorded as 4;solid,that without very strong was recorded as 3;more solid,that with very strong was recorded as 2;hard,that with very strong also difficult to insert the knife into the soil was recorded as 1 |
Table 4
Survey index statistics of ancient elm trees in Hohhot
指标类型 Indicator type | 指标 Indicator | 等级占比 Grade/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
健康指标 Growth index | 主干病害 Trunk disease | 13 | 7 | 25 | 34 | 21 |
主干虫害 Trunk pest | 15 | 4 | 28 | 31 | 22 | |
树皮损伤 Bark damage | 25 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 37 | |
形态指标 Morphological indicators | 主干倾斜 Trunk tilt | 1 | 8 | 22 | 31 | 38 |
冠形 Crown shape | 5 | 7 | 23 | 32 | 33 | |
环境指标 Environmental indicators | 根系生长空间 Root growth space | 3 | 6 | 21 | 38 | 32 |
树冠生长空间 Canopy growth space | 0 | 6 | 25 | 39 | 30 | |
土壤紧实度 Soil compaction | 0 | 8 | 20 | 34 | 38 |
Table 5
Linear regression analysis of the influencing factors of heart rot of ancient elm trees
指标 Index | 心腐指数 Heart rot index | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | P | 相关性 Correlation | ||
健康指标 Growth index | 主干病害 Trunk disease | 0.302 | <0.01 | 负相关 |
主干虫害 Trunk pest | 0.234 | <0.01 | 负相关 | |
树皮损伤 Bark damage | 0.225 | <0.01 | 负相关 | |
形态指标 Morphological indicators | 主干倾斜 Trunk tilt | 0.011 | >0.05 | 无相关性 |
冠形 Crown shape | 0.013 | >0.05 | 无相关性 | |
根系密度 Root density | 0.121 | <0.05 | 负相关 | |
环境指标 Environmental indicators | 根系生长空间 Root growth space | 0.187 | <0.05 | 正相关 |
树冠生长空间 Canopy growth space | 0.103 | <0.05 | 正相关 | |
土壤紧实度 Soil compaction | 0.248 | <0.01 | 负相关 |
1 | ÇOLAK A H, KIRCA S, ROTHERHAM I D.Ancient woods,trees and forests:ecology,history and management[M].London:Pelagic Publishing Ltd,2023:5-6. |
2 | 续九如,宋婉,邹受益,等.榆属树种遗传改良研究现状及思考[J].北京林业大学学报,2000,22(6):95-99. |
XU J R, SONG W, ZOU S Y,et al.Research status and some consideration in genetic improvement of elm species[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2000,22(6):95-99. | |
3 | 杨霞,李钢铁,王永胜,等.浑善达克沙地桑根达来古榆树调查研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,32(4):172-178. |
YANG X, LI G T, WANG Y S,et al.The ancient elm investigation of Sanggendalai of Hunshandake sandy land[J].Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition),2011,32(4):172-178. | |
4 | 孟瑞芳,乌兰娜,赵一凡,等.呼和浩特市古树资源现状分析[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2021,44(6):20-24. |
MENG R F, WU L N, ZHAO Y F,et al.Analysis on the present situation of ancient tree resources in Hohhot[J].Inner Mongolia Forestry Investigation and Design,2021,44(6):20-24. | |
5 | SUNDARARAJ R, SWETHA P, MONDAL S,et al.Incidence and effect of heart rot in Marayur sandalwood (Santalum album L.) reserve,Kerala,and its natural durability against fungi[J].Forest Science,2023,69(2):133-142. |
6 | ARHIPOVA N, GAITNIEKS T, DONIS J,et al.Heart-rot and associated fungi in Alnus glutinosa stands in Latvia[J].Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research,2012,27(4):327-336. |
7 | SCORTICHINI M, BELISARIO A, MOTTA E.Bacterial species in relation to forest tree decline[J].Journal of Arboriculture,1991,17(9):246-249. |
8 | PARKER E, LEWINGTON A.Ancient trees:trees that live for a thousand years[M].London:Batsford Books,2012:21-27. |
9 | ZAPPONI L, MAZZA G, FARINA A,et al.The role of monumental trees for the preservation of saproxylic biodiversity:re-thinking their management in cultural landscapes[J].Nature Conservation,2017,19:231-243. |
10 | 刘瑜,徐程扬.古树健康评价研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2013,26(1):37-42. |
LIU Y, XU C Y.Research progress in ancient trees health assessment[J].World Forestry Research,2013, 26(1):37-42. | |
11 | BAXTER D V.The biology and pathology of some of the hardwood heart-rotting fungi:Part I[J].American Journal of Botany,1925,12(8):522-552. |
12 | SUDIN M, LEE S S, HARUN A H.A survey of heart rot in some plantations of Acacia mangium in Sabah[J].Journal of Tropical Forest Science,1993,6(1):37-47. |
13 | 呼和浩特市古树名木保护条例[EB/OL].(2022-07-07)[2024-09-30].. |
Regulations on protection of ancient and famous trees in Hohhot[EB/OL].(2022-07-07)[2024-09-30].. | |
14 | 王毅明,韩文泉.PiCUS3在南京市梧桐树干空洞探测中的应用[J].城市勘测,2015(1):119-122. |
WANG Y M, HAN W Q.Application on detecting the caves in the trunk of phoenix tree with PiCUS3 in Nanjing[J].Urban Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying,2015(1):119-122. | |
15 | 袁岸.基于TRU树木雷达的悬铃木空腐率规律与根系分布特征探究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2022. |
YUAN A.Research on the law of empty rot rate and root distribution characteristics of Platanus acerifolia based on TRU tree radar[D].Yangling:Northwest A&F University,2022. | |
16 | 刘星旦,康永祥,甘明旭,等.黄帝陵古侧柏树干心腐研究[J].西北林学院学报,2017,32(2):180-187. |
LIU X D, KANG Y X, GAN M X,et al.A study on trunk decay of ancient Platycladus orientalis in tomb of Yellow Emperor[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2017,32(2):180-187. | |
17 | 刘俊雁,郑征,牛燕芬,等.西双版纳热带森林空心树形成概率及其影响因素[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(10):2621-2626. |
LIU J Y, ZHENG Z, NIU Y F,et al.Likelihood and influencing factors of tree cavities in tropical forest in Xishuangbanna,Southwest China[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2016,35(10):2621-2626. | |
18 | ADKINS M F.A burning issue:using fire to accelerate tree hollow formation in Eucalyptus species[J].Australian Forestry,2006,69(2):107-113. |
19 | ATKINSON P R, NIXON K M, SHAW M J P.On the susceptibility of Eucalyptus species and clones to attack by Macrotermes natalensis Haviland (Isoptera:Termitidae)[J].Forest Ecology and Management,1992,48(1/2):15-30. |
20 | 范丽华,张永红,李金桐,等.脐腹小蠹成虫触角结构与感受器扫描电镜观察[J].林业科学,2011,47(5):87-89. |
FAN L H, ZHANG Y H, LI J T,et al.Antennae structure of Scolytus schevyrewi observed with a scanning electron microscope[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2011,47(5):87-89. | |
21 | 徐勇,徐清华,姜雯,等.22%噻虫·高氯氟微囊悬浮-悬浮剂防治星天牛药效试验[J].农药,2023,62(6):458-460. |
XU Y, XU Q H, JIANG W,et al.Efficacy test of thiamethoxam·lambda-cyhalothrin 22% ZC for the control of Anoplophora chinensis [J].Agrochemicals,2023,62(6):458-460. | |
22 | MOHAN V, SUNDARARAJ R, PACHU A V.Wounding of trees:the precursor of wood decay[M]//SUNDARARAJ R.Science of wood degradation and its protection.Singapore:Springer,2022:87-113. |
23 | PENTON C E, WOOLLEY L A, RADFORD I J,et al.Blocked-off:termitaria cause the overestimation of tree hollow availability by ground-based surveys in northern Australia[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2020,458:117707. |
24 | KUMAR N P, ARYA A.A new heart rot disease in Ailanthus excelsa Roxb.caused by Navisporus floccosus (Bres.) Ryvarden[J].International Letters of Natural Sciences,2014,6:1-7. |
25 | 刘晚苟,山仑,邓西平.植物对土壤紧实度的反应[J].植物生理学通讯,2001,37(3):254-260. |
LIU W G, SHAN L, DENG X P.Responses of plant to soil compaction[J].Plant Physiology Communications,2001,37(3):254-260. | |
26 | 张承林,徐文彬.根域容积对盆栽杨桃生长发育的影响(简报)[J].热带作物学报,2005,26(3):20-23. |
ZHANG C L, XU W B.Effects of root volume on the growth and development of potted Carambola (brief reports)[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops,2005,26(3):20-23. | |
27 | 甘明旭.树木雷达(TRU)在黄帝陵古侧柏树干空腐和粗根分布检测中的应用[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2016. |
GAN M X.Tree radar unit (TRU) technology detected hollow trunk and thick root distribbution on the ancient and famous trees of Platycladus orientalis in the tomb of Yellow Emperor[D].Yangling:Northwest A&F University,2016. | |
28 | 王嘉楠,夏媛倩,赵德先,等.城市森林主要树种树冠尺度及生长空间需求[J].北京林业大学学报,2018,40(3):42-54. |
WANG J N, XIA Y Q, ZHAO D X,et al.Crown scale and growth space demands of main tree species in urban forest[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2018, 40(3):42-54. | |
29 | 李俞鑫,李莲芳,合金鑫,等.目标树生长空间释放对云南松生长及其器官和土壤养分的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2022,50(4):32-39. |
LI Y X, LI L F, HE J X,et al.Effects of spatial release of objective trees on growth involved nutrients of Pinus yunnanensis and soil[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2022,50(4):32-39. |
[1] | WANG Kai1;SONG Li-Ning2*;Lü Lin-You3;ZHANG Liang1;QIN Zheng-Yuan1. Fine Root Biomass Vertical Distribution Character of Main Afforestation Tree Species in Horqin Sandy Land [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2014, 34(6): 824-828. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||