植物研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 657-666.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2023.05.003
周露华1,2, 方俊仪1,2, 熊子墨1, 巫伟峰1, 刘佳瑞1,2, 陆乔3, 凌宏清3, 孔丹宇1,2
收稿日期:
2023-05-19
出版日期:
2023-09-20
发布日期:
2023-09-05
作者简介:
周露华(1995—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事植物分子遗传学研究。
基金资助:
Luhua ZHOU1,2, Junyi FANG1,2, Zimo XIONG1, Weifeng WU1, Jiarui LIU1,2, Qiao LU3, Hongqing LING3, Danyu KONG1,2
Received:
2023-05-19
Online:
2023-09-20
Published:
2023-09-05
About author:
ZHOU Luhua(1995—),female,Master candidate,major in plant molecular genetics.
Supported by:
摘要:
为了筛选出耐涝能力良好的番茄(Solanum)种质,以50份番茄种质作为研究对象,比较其在半淹及全淹处理后的成活率和各项生理指标,筛选出12个在7 d全淹处理后存活率为100%的耐涝型番茄种质,发现耐涝型番茄种质在普通番茄(S. lycopersicum)、樱桃番茄(S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)和醋栗番茄(S. pimpinellifolium)中均有分布;进一步对耐涝型番茄TK017和淹水敏感型番茄TK039的分析表明耐涝型番茄TK017在全淹胁迫下能够更有效地控制体内活性氧含量,从而提高番茄的耐涝能力。
中图分类号:
周露华, 方俊仪, 熊子墨, 巫伟峰, 刘佳瑞, 陆乔, 凌宏清, 孔丹宇. 不同番茄种质的耐涝能力评价[J]. 植物研究, 2023, 43(5): 657-666.
Luhua ZHOU, Junyi FANG, Zimo XIONG, Weifeng WU, Jiarui LIU, Qiao LU, Hongqing LING, Danyu KONG. Evaluation on Waterlogging Tolerance of Different Tomato Germplasm[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(5): 657-666.
表1
50个番茄品种的相关信息
编号 Code | 类别 Type | 来源地 Origin |
---|---|---|
TK008 | 醋栗番茄 S. pimpinellifolium | 南美洲 South America |
TK056 | 醋栗番茄 S. pimpinellifolium | 南美洲 South America |
TK078 | 醋栗番茄 S. pimpinellifolium | N/A |
TK115 | 醋栗番茄 S. pimpinellifolium | 南美洲 South America |
TK009 | 醋栗番茄 S. pimpinellifolium | N/A |
TK055 | 醋栗番茄 S. pimpinellifolium | 南美洲 South America |
TK110 | 醋栗番茄 S. pimpinellifolium | 南美洲 South America |
TK112 | 醋栗番茄 S. pimpinellifolium | 南美洲 South America |
TK007 | 醋栗番茄 S. pimpinellifolium | 南美洲 South America |
TK026 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 南美洲 South America |
TK048 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 欧洲 Europe |
TK070 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 欧洲 Europe |
TK072 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 北美洲 North America |
TK084 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 北美洲 North America |
TK085 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 南美洲 South America |
TK127 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 北美洲 North America |
TK134 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 北美洲 North America |
TK142 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 北美洲 North America |
TK148 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 北美洲 North America |
TK266 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 北美洲 North America |
TK300 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | N/A |
TK302 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | N/A |
TK303 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | N/A |
TK064 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 非洲 Africa |
TK041 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | N/A |
TK412 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 欧洲 Europe |
TK146 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | N/A |
TK029 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 欧洲 Europe |
TK062 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 亚洲 Asia |
TK065 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 欧洲 Europe |
TK068 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | 北美洲 North America |
TK265 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | N/A |
TK413 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | N/A |
TK003 | 番茄 S. lycopersicum | N/A |
TK039 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | N/A |
TK047 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | 南美洲 South America |
TK066 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | 南美洲 South America |
TK069 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | 亚洲 Asia |
TK105 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | 南美洲 South America |
TK106 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | 南美洲 South America |
TK107 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | 南美洲 South America |
TK135 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | 欧洲 Europe |
TK141 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | 欧洲 Europe |
TK300 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | N/A |
TK017 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | 南美洲 South America |
TK022 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | 欧洲 Europe |
TK024 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | N/A |
TK300 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | N/A |
TK304 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | N/A |
TK037 | 樱桃番茄 S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme | 南美洲 South America |
1 | 杨兴云,乔丹丹,张雅洁,等.鸭茅响应水淹胁迫的miRNA差异表达分析[J].草业学报,2022,31(6): 150-162. |
YANG X Y, QIAO D D, ZHANG Y J,et al.A differential gene expression analysis of miRNA in dactylis glomerata in response to flooding stress[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2022,31(6):150-162. | |
2 | ABIKO T, KOTULA L, SHIONO K,et al.Enhanced formation of aerenchyma and induction of a barrier to radial oxygen loss in adventitious roots of zea nicaraguensis contribute to its waterlogging tolerance as compared with maize (Zea mays ssp.mays)[J].Plant,Cell & Environment,2012,35(9):1618-1630. |
3 | BAILEY-SERRES J, LEE S C, BRINTON E.Waterproofing crops:effective flooding survival strategies[J].Plant Physiology,2012,160(4):1698-1709. |
4 | BOULANGE J, HANASAKI N, YAMAZAKI D,et al.Role of dams in reducing global flood exposure under climate change[J].Nature Communication,2021,12(1):417. |
5 | BAILEY-SERRES J, VOESENEK L A C J.Flooding stress:acclimations and genetic diversity[J].Annual Review of Plant Biology,2008,59:313-339. |
6 | NAGAI K, MORI Y, ISHIKAWA S,et al.Antagonistic regulation of the gibberellic acid response during stem growth in rice[J].Nature,2020,584(7819):109-114. |
7 | NAGAI K, HATTORI Y, ASHIKARI M.Stunt or elongate? Two opposite strategies by which rice adapts to floods[J].Journal of Plant Research,2010,123(3):303-309. |
8 | NIROULA R K, PUCCIARIELLO C, HO V T,et al.SUB1A-dependent and -independent mechanisms are involved in the flooding tolerance of wild rice species[J].The Plant Journal,2012,72(2):282-293. |
9 | COLLARD B C Y, SEPTININGSIH E M, DAS S R,et al.Developing new flood-tolerant varieties at the international rice research institute(IRRI)[J].SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics,2013,45(1):42-56. |
10 | JIA W T, MA M H, CHEN J L,et al.Plant morphological,physiological and anatomical adaption to flooding stress and the underlying molecular mechanisms[J].International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2021,22(3):1088. |
11 | STEFFENS B, RASMUSSEN A.The physiology of adventitious roots[J].Plant Physiology,2016,170(2):603-617. |
12 | SAUTER M.Root responses to flooding[J].Current Opinion in Plant Biology,2013,16(3):282-286. |
13 | YAMAUCHI T, TANAKA A, TSUTSUMI N,et al.A role for auxin in ethylene-dependent inducible aerenchyma formation in rice roots[J].Plants(Basel),2020,9(5):610 |
14 | BLOKHINA O, FAGERSTEDT K V.Oxidative metabolism,ROS and NO under oxygen deprivation[J].Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,2010,48(5):359-373. |
15 | CHOUDHURY F K, RIVERO R M, BLUMWALD E,et al.Reactive oxygen species,abiotic stress and stress combination[J].The Plant Journal,2017,90(5):856-867. |
16 | SASIDHARAN R, HARTMAN S, LIU Z G,et al.Signal dynamics and interactions during flooding stress[J].Plant Physiology,2018,176(2):1106-1117. |
17 | APEL K, HIRT H.Reactive oxygen species:metabolism,oxidative stress,and signal transduction[J].Annual Review of Plant Biology,2004,55:373-399. |
18 | 尹婷辉,林瑞君,孙林,等.华南22种园林植物耐涝性筛选[J].浙江林业科技,2022,42(1):31-40. |
YIN T H, LIN R J, SUN L,et al.Experiment on waterlogging stress of 22 garden plant species in Shenzhen[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2022,42(1):31-40. | |
19 | SASIDHARAN R, VOESENEK L A C J.Ethylene-mediated acclimations to flooding stress[J].Plant Physiology,2015,169(1):3-12. |
20 | 姜玉萍,郝婷,张兆辉,等.淹水对不同蔬菜生长和光合作用的影响[J].上海农业学报,2013,29(5):97-100. |
JIANG Y P, HAO T, ZHANG Z H,et al.Effects of waterlogging on growth and photosynthesis of 3 vegetable crops[J].Acta Agriculturae Shanghai,2013,29(5):97-100. | |
21 | 刘聪聪,兰超杰,李欢,等.樱桃番茄苗期对淹水胁迫的响应及其耐涝性评价[J].核农学报,2020,34(3):650-660. |
LIU C C, LAN C J, LI H,et al.Responses of waterlogging stress and evaluation of waterlogging tolerance in cherry tomato at seedling stage[J].Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences,2020,34(3):650-660. | |
22 | 郑积荣,汪炳良,王慧俐.番茄多茸毛性状的遗传研究及其利用价值[J].江西农业学报,2010,22(6):61-64. |
ZHENG J R, WANG B L, WANG H L.Study on inheritance of hairy trait of tomato and its value in tomato breeding[J].Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi,2010,22(6):61-64. | |
23 | WU J Q, CHENG J, XU C M,et al.AUREA maintains the balance between chlorophyll synthesis and adventitious root formation in tomato[J].Horticulture Research,2020,7(1):166. |
24 | RASHEED R, IQBAL M, ASHRAF M A,et al.Glycine betaine counteracts the inhibitory effects of waterlogging on growth,photosynthetic pigments,oxidative defence system,nutrient composition,and fruit quality in tomato[J].The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology,2018,93(4):385-391. |
25 | HARTMAN S, VAN DONGEN N, RENNEBERG D M H J,et al.Ethylene differentially modulates hypoxia responses and tolerance across solanum species[J].Plants,2020,9(8):1022. |
26 | KLAY I, GOUIA S, LIU M C,et al.Ethylene Response Factors (ERF) are differentially regulated by different abiotic stress types in tomato plants[J].Plant Science,2018,274:137-145. |
27 | 张小莉,王鹏程,宋纯鹏.植物细胞过氧化氢的测定方法[J].植物学报,2009,44(1):103-106. |
ZHANG X L, WANG P C, SONG C P.Methods of detecting hydrogen peroxide in plant cells[J].Chinese Bulletin of Botany,2009,44(1):103-106. | |
28 | 聂功平,陈敏敏,杨柳燕,等.植物响应淹水胁迫的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2021,37(18):57-64. |
NIE G P, CHEN M M, YANG L Y,et al.Plant response to waterlogging stress:research progress[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2021,37(18):57-64. | |
29 | COLMER T D, VOESENEK L A C J.Flooding tolerance:suites of plant traits in variable environments[J].Functional Plant Biology,2009,36(8):665-681. |
30 | VOESENEK L A C J, BAILEY-SERRES J.Flood adaptive traits and processes:an overview[J].New Phytologist,2015,206(1):57-73. |
31 | JIA L T, QIN X, LYU D G,et al.ROS production and scavenging in three cherry rootstocks under short-term waterlogging conditions[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2019,257:108647. |
32 | 常二梅,史胜青,刘建锋,等.古侧柏针叶活性氧产生及其清除机制[J].东北林业大学学报,2011,39(11):8-11. |
CHANG E M, SHI S Q, LIU J F,et al.ROS production and its elimination in old platycladus orientalis’s leaves[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2011,39(11):8-11. | |
33 | 李博书,陈晶,杨亮,等.干旱胁迫对不同生育时期大豆叶片抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].大豆科技,2022(3):12-17. |
LI B S, CHEN J, YANG L,et al.Effects of drought stress on antioxidant enzymes activities in soybean leaves at different growth stages[J].Soybean Science & Technology,2022(3):12-17. | |
34 | 刘聪聪,兰超杰,李欢,等.淹水胁迫及恢复对樱桃番茄苗期根系和叶片细胞膜稳定性的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2022,41(9):61-70. |
LIU C C, LAN C J, LI H,et al.Effects of flooding stress and recovery on root and leaf cell membrane stability at cherry tomato seedlings[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage,2022,41(9):61-70. | |
35 | 刘江,李明倩,常峻菲,等.干旱胁迫及复水对大豆关键生育时期叶片生理特性的影响[J].中国农业气象,2022,43(8):622-632. |
LIU J, LI M Q, CHANG J F,et al.Physiological characteristics of soybean leaves at different growth stages[J].Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology,2022,43(8):622-632. |
[1] | 王春瑶, 雷晓锦, 刘中原. 逆境胁迫下山新杨PdbHMGs基因表达模式分析[J]. 植物研究, 2023, 43(6): 932-942. |
[2] | 单超然, 陈晓慧, 丁云飞, 赵威, 卢晗, 高尚珠, 齐凤慧, 詹亚光, 曾凡锁. 水曲柳FmCCoAOMT基因在木质素合成及非生物胁迫中的功能分析[J]. 植物研究, 2023, 43(5): 768-778. |
[3] | 覃碧, 王肖肖, 杨玉双, 聂秋海, 陈秋惠, 刘实忠. 橡胶草TkAPC10基因的鉴定及其表达模式分析[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(5): 830-839. |
[4] | 张博超, 王佳琳, 殷缘, 车易达, 邓俊杰, 张荣沭. 山新杨PdPapWRKY51基因在胁迫条件下的组织表达模式[J]. 植物研究, 2021, 41(6): 911-920. |
[5] | 王肖肖, 覃碧, 杨玉双, 聂秋海, 张继川, 刘实忠. 橡胶草E2泛素结合酶基因TkUBC2基因的克隆及其表达分析[J]. 植物研究, 2021, 41(1): 98-106. |
[6] | 姜骋, 张曦, 田晴, 李莉. 白桦BpbHLH112基因克隆及其启动子表达特性分析[J]. 植物研究, 2020, 40(4): 583-592. |
[7] | 马苗苗, 李成浩, 刘晓, 张馨, 杨静莉. 日本落叶松LoERF017基因的克隆及生物信息学分析[J]. 植物研究, 2020, 40(4): 602-612. |
[8] | 张雨晴, 刘野, 曲春浦, 刘关君, 杨天天, 杨成君. 转基因PnDof30拟南芥非生物胁迫下的抗性分析[J]. 植物研究, 2020, 40(3): 407-415. |
[9] | 刘佳丽, 何明良, 刘晨曦, 廖栩, 李秀峰, 管清杰. 水稻盐碱逆境响应锌指蛋白基因OsZFP6表达特性及功能研究[J]. 植物研究, 2020, 40(3): 424-432. |
[10] | 李亚博, 吕佳欣, 谭冰, 高彩球. 5个毛果杨PtrZFP基因的鉴定和表达分析[J]. 植物研究, 2020, 40(2): 243-250. |
[11] | 秦琳琳, 张曦, 姜骋, 李莉. 白桦BpZFP4基因启动子克隆和逆境响应元件功能分析[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(6): 917-926. |
[12] | 冯学超, 陈露露, 杜可玉, 李勇鹏, 赵凌侠. 毛酸浆(Physalis pubescens)花形态特征与小孢子发育[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(5): 647-652. |
[13] | 王恒涛, 邵婉璇, 徐舒浩, 曾凡锁. 水曲柳FmMUR5基因的克隆及表达模式的分析[J]. 植物研究, 2018, 38(6): 913-920. |
[14] | 葛晓兰, 刘彩霞, 张鑫鑫, 李莹, 曲冠证. 柽柳ThDUF106基因的植物表达载体构建及其功能验证[J]. 植物研究, 2018, 38(2): 260-267. |
[15] | 龚道勇, 胡尚连, 曹颖, 卢学琴, 张庆波. 2个慈竹bZIP基因的克隆、生物信息学分析及其诱导表达[J]. 植物研究, 2018, 38(2): 268-277. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||