Integrative Biology Journals

JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 1-.DOI: 10.1007/s11676-026-02007-0

• Original Paper •    

Extraction of genetic test measurements from LiDAR cloud data

Ricardo Cavalheiro1,2, Juan Alberto Molina‑Valero3,4, Gary Hodge1,2, Travis Howell1, Juan Jose Acosta1,2   

  1. 1Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27 607, USA Camcore, North 

    2Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27 607, USA 

    3Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZU), 16 500 Prague, Czech Republic

    4Department of Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic

  • Received:2025-04-17 Accepted:2025-06-23 Online:2026-02-05 Published:2026-01-01
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the Postdoctoral Fellow “Becas Fundación Ramón Areces para Estudios Posdoctorales” [BEVP35A7109] and the MSCA-COFUND Fellow within the framework of the project “Central Bohemian Mobility Pro-gramme for Excellence in Research, Innovation and Technology” [GA 101081195-MERIT].

Abstract: Forest measurements, including genetic trials, have relied on traditional measurement methods, an approach affected by different types of errors. To assess genetic trials, Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) devices offer potential to improve accuracy. This study aimed to imple ment an approach for analyzing forest genetics trial measure ments using TLS data. A 15-year-old Pinus taeda L. progeny test in North Carolina USA was assessed using both TLS data and traditional field measurements. Accuracy was assessed using adjusted R2, bias, percent bias, and RMSE. Genetic parameters were estimated via BLUP for diameter at breast height (DBH). The R2adj values were 0.56 for DBH and 0.29 for total height (HT). Field-measured DBH had higher heritability (h2 = 0.32) than raw TLS data (h2 = 0.17). However, “cleaned” TLS estimates (DBHR) improved herit ability (h2 = 0.27) and showed stronger phenotypic correla tion with DBHF (R = 0.84) than DBHL (R = 0.75). GCA predictions using BLUP showed high correlation (= 0.92) between field and TLS DBH estimates. Estimated gains using DBHwere 11.3% and 12.1% for selecting the top 1st progeny (30 families) and the top 1st and 2nd progenies (15 families), respectively. Estimated gains using DBHF were 11.3% and 12.1% for selecting the top 1st progeny (30 fami lies) and the top 1st and 2nd progenies (15 families), respec tively. Corresponding gains from DBHL were 6.9% and 9.6%, and from DBHR, 8.5% and 10.3%. The results demon strate that TLS, combined with the proposed methodology, is a reliable alternative for genetic analysis in forest trials.

Key words: Terrestrial laser scanning, Tree breeding, Genetic trials, Precision forestry, LiDAR