Disentangling the effects of management and climate change on habitat suitability for saproxylic species in boreal forests

doi:10.1007/s11676-023-01678-3

Abstract

Abstract:

Forest degradation induced by intensive forest management and temperature increase by climate change are resulting in biodiversity decline in boreal forests. Intensive forest management and high-end climate emission scenarios can further reduce the amount and diversity of deadwood, the limiting factor for habitats for saproxylic species in European boreal forests. The magnitude of their combined effects and how changes in forest management can affect deadwood diversity under a range of climate change scenarios are poorly understood. We used forest growth simulations to evaluate how forest management and climate change will individually and jointly affect habitats of red-listed saproxylic species in Finland. We simulated seven forest management regimes and three climate scenarios (reference, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) over 100 years. Management regimes included set aside, continuous cover forestry, business-as-usual (BAU) and four modifications of BAU. Habitat suitability was assessed using a species-specific habitat suitability index, including 21 fungal and invertebrate species groups. “Winner” and “loser” species were identified based on the modelled impacts of forest management and climate change on their habitat suitability. We found that forest management had a major impact on habitat suitability of saproxylic species compared to climate change. Habitat suitability index varied by over 250% among management regimes, while overall change in habitat suitability index caused by climate change was on average only 2%. More species groups were identified as winners than losers from impacts of climate change (52%–95% were winners, depending on the climate change scenario and management regime). The largest increase in habitat suitability index was achieved under set aside (254%) and the climate scenario RCP8.5 (> 2%), while continuous cover forestry was the most suitable regime to increase habitat suitability of saproxylic species (up to + 11%) across all climate change scenarios. Our results show that close-to-nature management regimes (e.g., continuous cover forestry and set aside) can increase the habitat suitability of many saproxylic boreal species more than the basic business-as-usual regime. This suggests that biodiversity loss of many saproxylic species in boreal forests can be mitigated through improved forest management practices, even as climate change progresses.

Key words: Biodiversity, Simulations, Finland, Forest planning, Habitat suitability, Deadwood

Ellinoora Ekman, María Triviño, Clemens Blattert, Adriano Mazziotta, Maria Potterf, Kyle Eyvindson. Disentangling the effects of management and climate change on habitat suitability for saproxylic species in boreal forests[J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2024, 35(1): 34-.

Ellinoora Ekman, María Triviño, Clemens Blattert, Adriano Mazziotta, Maria Potterf, Kyle Eyvindson. [J]. 林业研究(英文版), 2024, 35(1): 34-.

References 70

1	Äijälä O, Koistinen A, Sved J, Vanhatalo K, Väsäinen P (2014) Hyvän metsänhoidon suositukset [Good forest management recommendations]. Forestry Development Center Tapio (In Finnish)
2	Blattert C, Eyvindson K, Hartikainen M, Burgas D, Potterf M, Lukkarinen J, Snäll T, Toraño-Caicoya A, Mönkkönen M. Sectoral policies cause incoherence in forest management and ecosystem service provisioning. For Policy Econ, 2022, 136, DOI
3	Burton PJ, Messier C, Smith DW, Adamowiz WL. Towards sustainable management of the boreal forest, 2003 Ottawa NRC Research Press
4	Cajander AK. Forest types and their significance. Silva Fenn, 1949, 56: 7396
5	Della Rocca F, Milanesi P. Combining climate, land use change and dispersal to predict the distribution of endangered species with limited vagility. J Biogeogr, 2020, 47: 1427-1438, DOI
6	Dyola N, Sigdel SR, Liang E, Babst F, Camarero JJ, Aryal S, Chettri N, Gao S, Lu X, Sun J, Wang T, Zhang G, Zhu H, Piao S, Peñuelas J. Species richness is a strong driver of forest biomass along broad bioclimatic gradients in the Himalayas. Ecosphere, 2022, 13, DOI
7	Edenius L, Mikusiński G. Utility of habitat suitability models as biodiversity assessment tools in forest management. Scand J For Res, 2006, 21: 62-72, DOI
8	Eyvindson K, Duflot R, Triviño M, Blattert C, Potterf M, Mönkkönen M. High boreal forest multifunctionality requires continuous cover forestry as a dominant management. Land Use Policy, 2021, 100, DOI
9	FAO (2010) Global Forests Resources Assessment. Main report, FAO, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/i1757e/i1757e.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2021
10	Felton A, Sonesson J, Nilsson U, Lämås T, Lundmark T, Nordin A, Ranius T, Roberge JM. Varying rotation lengths in northern production forests: Implications for habitats provided by retention and production trees. Ambio, 2017, 46: 324-334, DOI
11	Finnish Forest Centre (2021) Open forest information. Available from www.metsakeskus.fi/fi/avoin-metsa-ja-luontotieto/metsatietoaineistot/metsavaratiedot. Accessed 1 Sept 2021
12	Foden WB, Butchart SHM, Stuart SN, Vié JC, Akçakaya HR, Angulo A, DeVantier LM, Gutsche A, Turak E, Cao L, Donner SD, Katariya V, Bernard R, Holland RA, Hughes AF, O’Hanlon SE, Garnett ST, Şekercioğlu ÇH, Mace GM. Identifying the world’s most climate change vulnerable species: a systematic trait-based assessment of all birds, amphibians and corals. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8, DOI
13	Gossner MM, Lachat T, Brunet J, Isacsson G, Bouget C, Brustel H, Brandl R, Weisser WW, Müller J. Current near-to-nature forest management effects on functional trait composition of saproxylic beetles in beech forests. Conserv Biol, 2013, 27: 605-614, DOI
14	Hämäläinen A, Kouki J, Lohmus P. The value of retained Scots pines and their dead wood legacies for lichen diversity in clear-cut forests: The effects of retention level and prescribed burning. For Ecol Manag, 2014, 324: 89-100, DOI
15	Harmon ME, Fasth BG, Yatskov M, Kastendick D, Rock J, Woodall CW. Release of coarse woody detritus-related carbon: A synthesis across forest biomes. Carbon Balance Manag, 2020, 15: 1-21, DOI
16	Harmon ME, Sexton J. Guidelines for measurements for of woody detritus in forest ecosystems, 1996 Washington Seattle
17	Hautala H, Jalonen J, Laaka-Lindberg S, Vanha-Majamaa I. Impacts of retention felling on coarse woody debris (CWD) in mature boreal spruce forests in Finland. Biodivers Conserv, 2004, 13: 1541-1554, DOI
18	Heinonen T, Pukkala T, Kellomäki S, Strandman H, Asikainen A, Venäläinen A, Peltola H. Effects of forest management and harvesting intensity on the timber supply from Finnish forests in a changing climate. Can J For Res, 2018, 48: 1124-1134, DOI
19	Heinonen T, Pukkala T, Mehtätalo L, Asikainen A, Kangas J, Peltola H. Scenario analyses for the effects of harvesting intensity on development of forest resources, timber supply, carbon balance and biodiversity of Finnish forestry. For Policy Econ, 2017, 80: 80-98, DOI
20	Henttonen HM, Nöjd P, Suvanto S, Heikkinen J, Mäkinen H. Large trees have increased greatly in Finland during 1921–2013, but recent observations on old trees tell a different story. Ecol Indic, 2019, 99: 118-129, DOI
21	IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
22	Jaeschke A, Bittner T, Reineking B, Beierkuhnlein C. Can they keep up with climate change? Integrating specific dispersal abilities of protected Odonata in species distribution modelling. Insect Conserv Divers, 2013, 6: 93-103, DOI
23	Jönsson AM, Lagergren F, Smith B. Forest management facing climate change − an ecosystem model analysis of adaptation strategies. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang, 2015, 20: 201-220, DOI
24	Jonsson M, Bengtsson J, Moen J, Gamfeldt L, Snäll T (2020) Stand age and climate influence forest ecosystem service delivery and multifunctionality. Environ Res Lett 15:0940a8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abaf1c
25	Jonsson R. How to cope with changing demand conditions − the Swedish forest sector as a case study: An analysis of major drivers of change in the use of wood resources. Can J For Res, 2013, 43: 405-418, DOI
26	Juutinen A, Mönkkönen M, Sippola AL. Cost-Efficiency of decaying wood as a surrogate for overall species richness in boreal forests. Conserv Biol, 2006, 20: 74-84, DOI
27	Kellomäki S. Managing boreal forests in the context of climate change: impacts, 2017 Adaptation and Climate Change Mitigation CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, DOI
28	Kellomäki S. Kellomäki S. Successional dynamics of boreal forest ecosystem. Management of Boreal Forests: Theories and Applications for Ecosystem Services, 2022 Springer 219-278, DOI
29	Kellomäki S, Peltola H, Nuutinen T, Korhonen KT, Strandman H. Sensitivity of managed boreal forests in Finland to climate change, with implications for adaptive management. Philos Trans R Soc Lond b, Biol Sci, 2008, 363: 2339-2349, DOI
30	Kouki J, Tikkanen OP (eds) (2007) Uhanalaisten lahopuulajien elinympäristöjen turvaaminen suojelualueilla ja talousmetsissä: Kustannustehokkuus ja ekologiset, ekonomiset sekä sosiaaliset vaikutukset Kitsin seudulla Lieksassa (Conservation of threatened saproxylic species assemblages in eastern Finland: long-term cost-efficient solutions and their ecological, economic and social implications). Suomen Ympäristö-Finnish Environment 24:1–104
31	Kuuluvainen T, Lindberg H, Vanha-Majamaa I, Keto-Tokoi P, Punttila P. Low-level retention forestry, certification, and biodiversity: case Finland. Ecol Process, 2019, 8: 47, DOI
32	Kuuluvainen T, Tahvonen O, Aakala T. Even-aged and uneven-aged forest management in boreal Fennoscandia: a review. Ambio, 2012, 41: 720-737, DOI
33	Lassauce A, Paillet Y, Jactel H, Bouget C (2011) Deadwood as a surrogate for forest biodiversity: Meta-analysis of correlations between deadwood volume and species richness of saproxylic organisms. Ecol Indic 11:1027–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.02.004
34	Lehtonen A, Venäläinen A, Kämäräinen M, Peltola H, Gregow H. Risk of large-scale fires in boreal forests of Finland under changing climate. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 2016, 16: 239-253, DOI
35	Lindenmayer DB. Forest wildlife management and conservation. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2009, 1162: 284-310, DOI
36	Mair L, Jönsson M, Räty M, Bärring L, Strandberg G, Lämås T, Snäll T. Land use changes could modify future negative effects of climate change on old-growth forest indicator species. Divers Distrib, 2018, 24: 1416-1425, DOI
37	Mäkinen H, Hynynen J, Siitonen J, Sievänen R. Predicting the decomposition of Scots pine, Norway spruce, and birch stems in Finland. Ecol Appl, 2006, 16: 1865-1879, DOI
38	Matala J, Ojansuu R, Peltola H, Raitio H, Kellomäki S. Modelling the response of tree growth to temperature and CO₂ elevation as related to the fertility and current temperature sum of a site. Ecol Modell, 2006, 199: 39-52, DOI
39	Matala J, Ojansuu R, Peltola H, Sievänen R, Kellomäki S. Introducing effects of temperature and CO₂ elevation on tree growth into a statistical growth and yield model. Ecol Modell, 2005, 181: 173-190, DOI
40	Mazziotta A, Lundström J, Forsell N, Moor H, Eggers J, Subramanian N, Aquilué N, Morán-Ordóñez A, Brotons L, Snäll T. More future synergies and less trade-offs between forest ecosystem services with natural climate solutions instead of bioeconomy solutions. Glob Chang Biol, 2022, 28(21): 6333-6348, DOI
41	Mazziotta A, Mönkkönen M, Strandman H, Routa J, Tikkanen OP, Kellomäki S. Modeling the effects of climate change and management on the dead wood dynamics in boreal forest plantations. Eur J For Res, 2014, 133: 405-421, DOI
42	Mazziotta A, Triviño M, Tikkanen OP, Kouki J, Strandman H, Mönkkönen M. Habitat associations drive species vulnerability to climate change in boreal forests. Clim Change, 2016, 135: 585-595, DOI
43	Mikkonen S, Laine M, Mäkelä HM, Gregow H, Tuomenvirta H, Lahtinen M, Laaksonen A. Trends in the average temperature in Finland, 1847–2013. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess, 2015, 29: 1521-1529, DOI
44	Mönkkönen M, Aakala T, Blattert C, Burgas D, Duflot R, Eyvindson K, Kouki J, Laaksonen T, Punttila P. More wood but less biodiversity in forests in Finland: a historical evaluation. Memo Soc Fauna Flora Fenn, 2022, 98: 1-11
45	Mönkkönen M, Juutinen A, Mazziotta A, Miettinen K, Podkopaev D, Reunanen P, Salminen H, Tikkanen OP (2014) Spatially dynamic forest management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. J Environ Manag 134:80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.021
46	Peltola A, Räty M, Sauvula-Seppälä T, Torvelainen J, Uotila E, Vaahtera E, Ylitalo E (2020) Metsätilastot – Finnish Forest Statistics (In Finnish and English). Luonnonvarakeskus (Luke). Helsinki.
47	Penttilä R, Siitonen J, Kuusinen M. Polypore diversity in managed and old-growth boreal Picea abies forests in southern Finland. Biol Conserv, 2004, 117: 271-283, DOI
48	Peura M, Burgas D, Eyvindson K, Repo A, Mönkkönen M. Continuous cover forestry is a cost-efficient tool to increase multifunctionality of boreal production forests in Fennoscandia. Biol Conserv, 2018, 217: 104-112, DOI
49	Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O. Species interactions in the dynamics of even- and uneven-aged boreal forests. J Sustain For, 2013, 32: 371-403, DOI
50	Rasinmäki J, Mäkinen A, Kalliovirta J. SIMO: An adaptable simulation framework for multiscale forest resource data. Comput Electron Agric, 2009, 66: 76-84, DOI
51	Rassi P, Hyvärinen E, Juslén A, Mannerkoski I (2010) The 2010 Red List of Finnish Species. Ympäristöministeriö and Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki, p 182
52	Ruosteenoja K, Jylhä K, Kämäräinen M. Climate projections for Finland under the RCP forcing scenarios. Geophysica, 2016, 51: 17-50
53	Russell MB, Woodall CW, D’Amato AW, Fraver S, Bradford JB. Linking climate change and downed woody debris decomposition across forests of the eastern United States. Biogeosciences, 2014, 1: 6417-6425, DOI
54	Siira-Pietikäinen A, Haimi J. Changes in soil fauna 10 years after forest harvestings: comparison between clear felling and green-tree retention methods. For Ecol Manag, 2009, 258: 332-338, DOI
55	Siitonen J (2001) Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol Bull 11–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/20113262
56	Siitonen J, Saaristo L. Habitat requirements and conservation of Pytho kolwensis, a beetle species of old-growth boreal forest. Biol Conserv, 2000, 94: 211-220, DOI
57	Stokland JN, Siitonen J, Jonsson BG. biodiversity in dead wood, 2012 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 510, DOI
58	Subramanian N, Nilsson U, Mossberg M, Bergh J. Impacts of climate change, weather extremes and alternative strategies in managed forests. Ecoscience, 2019, 26: 53-70, DOI
59	Svensson J, Andersson J, Sandström P, Mikusiński G, Jonsson BG. Landscape trajectory of natural boreal forest loss as an impediment to green infrastructure. Conserv Biol, 2019, 33: 152-163, DOI
60	Tikkanen OP, Heinonen T, Kouki J, Matero J. Habitat suitability models of saproxylic red-listed boreal forest species in long-term matrix management: Cost-effective measures for multi-species conservation. Biol Conserv, 2007, 140: 359-372, DOI
61	Tikkanen OP, Martikainen P, Hyvarinen E, Junninen K, Kouki J. Red-listed boreal forest species of Finland: associations with forest structure, tree species, and decaying wood. Ann Zool Fennici, 2006, 43: 373-383
62	Triviño M, Pohjanmies T, Mazziotta A, Juutinen A, Podkopaev D, Le Tortorec E, Mönkkönen M. Optimizing management to enhance multifunctionality in a boreal forest landscape. J Appl Ecol, 2017, 54: 61-70, DOI
63	Tuomi M, Laiho R, Repo A, Liski J. Wood decomposition model for boreal forests. Ecol Modell, 2011, 222: 709-718, DOI
64	van Lierop P, Lindquist E, Sathyapala S, Franceschini G. Global forest area disturbance from fire, insect pests, diseases and severe weather events. For Ecol Manag, 2015, 352: 78-88, DOI
65	van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K, Hurtt GC, Kram T, Krey V, Lamarque JF, Masui T, Meinshausen M, Nakicenovic N, Smith SJ, Rose SK. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Change, 2011, 109: 5-31, DOI
66	Venäläinen A, Lehtonen I, Laapas M, Ruosteenoja K, Tikkanen OP, Viiri H, Ikonen VP, Peltola H. Climate change induces multiple risks to boreal forests and forestry in Finland: a literature review. Glob Chang Biol, 2020, 26: 4178-4196, DOI
67	Von Salzen K, Scinocca JF, McFarlane NA, Li J, Cole JNS, Plummer D, Verseghy D, Reader MC, Ma X, Lazare M, Solheim L (2013) The Canadian fourth generation atmospheric global climate model (CanAM4). Part I: Representation of physical processes. Atmos Ocean 51:104–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2012.755610
68	Work TT, Jacobs JM, Spence JR, Volney WJ. High levels of green-tree retention are required to preserve ground beetle biodiversity in boreal mixedwood forests. Ecol Appl, 2010, 20: 741-751, DOI
69	Yang S, Limpens J, Sterck FJ, Sass-Klaassen U, Cornelissen JHC, Hefting M, van Logtestijn RSP, Goudzwaard L, Dam N, Dam M, Veerkamp MT, van den Berg B, Brouwer E, Chang C, Poorter L. Dead wood diversity promotes fungal diversity. Oikos, 2021, 130: 2202-2216, DOI
70	Zubizarreta-Gerendiain A, Pukkala T, Peltola H. Effect of wind damage on the habitat suitability of saproxylic species in a boreal forest landscape. J Forestry Res, 2019, 30: 879-889, DOI

[1]	Alessandra Pacini, Francesco Pelleri, Francesco Marini, Alberto Maltoni, Barbara Mariotti, Gianluigi Mazza, Maria Chiara Manetti. Impact of cattle density on the structure and natural regeneration of a turkey oak stand on an agrosilvopastoral farm in central Italy [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2024, 35(1): 22-.
[2]	Julia Isabella de Matos Rodrigues, Walmer Bruno Rocha Martins, Victor Pereira de Oliveira, Myriam Suelen da Silva Wanzerley, Hélio Brito dos Santos Júnior, Francisco de Assis Oliveira. ENSO impacts on litter stocks and water holding capacity in secondary forests in eastern Amazonia [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2024, 35(1): 8-.
[3]	Simin Wang, Bo Liu, Rui Li, Xiaoxin Sun, Rong Mao. Temporal changes in mixing effects on litter decay and nitrogen release in a boreal riparian forest in northeastern China [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2024, 35(1): 1-.
[4]	Evgenios Agathokleous, Pierre Sicard, Zhaozhong Feng, Elena Paoletti. Ozone pollution threatens bird populations to collapse: an imminent ecological threat? [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 34(6): 1653-1656.
[5]	Yuanfa Li, Shaoming Ye, Yinghua Luo, Sufang Yu, Gongqiao Zhang. Relationship between species diversity and tree size in natural forests around the Tropic of Cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 34(6): 1735-1745.
[6]	Aline das Graças Costa, Fillipe Tamiozzo Pereira Torres, Gumercindo Souza Lima, Fabiano Rodrigues de Melo, Carlos Moreira Miquelino Eleto Torres, Bruno Leão Said Schettini, Vicente Paulo Santana Neto, André Luiz Lopes de Faria. Influence of fire on woody vegetation of savanna and forest formations in the Cerrado biome [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 34(5): 1207-1216.
[7]	Umar Aftab Abbasi, Eskil Mattsson, Sarath Premalal Nissanka, Arshad Ali. Species α-diversity promotes but β-diversity restricts aboveground biomass in tropical forests, depending on stand structure and environmental factors [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 34(4): 889-901.
[8]	Zijun Ma, Peng Zhang, Nanlin Hu, Guodong Wang, Yulin Dong, Yujie Guo, Chengcong Wang, Yao Fu, Zhibin Ren. Understanding the drivers of woody plant diversity in urban parks in a snow climate city of China [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 34(4): 1021-1032.
[9]	Jiefeng Kang, Shozo Shibata. A dispersed vegetative cover contributes to urban biodiversity: plant diversity across land use types and scale in an Asian city [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 34(2): 539-551.