Integrative Biology Journals

JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 1-.DOI: 10.1007/s11676-026-01988-2

• Original Paper •    

Effects of fuel types and fire severity on atmospheric pollutant emissions in an extreme wind‑driven wildfire

Albert Alvarez1,2, Judit Lecina‑Diaz3, Miquel De Cáceres2, Jordi Vayreda2, Javier Retana1,2   

  1. 1Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain 

    2CREAF, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain 

    3Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest Management Group, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Hans-Carl-Von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354 Freising, Germany

  • Received:2024-12-13 Accepted:2025-05-15 Online:2026-03-17 Published:2026-01-01
  • Supported by:
    This work has been funded by the project GREEN-RISK “Evaluation of past changes in ecosystem services and biodiversity in forests and restoration priorities under global change impacts” (PID2020-119933RB-C21/ AEI/10.13039/501100011033), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.

Abstract: In the Mediterranean region, wind-driven crown fires are becoming more frequent, leading to increased atmospheric pollutant emissions. This study explored how the distribution of pre-fire fuels across the crown, shrub and litter layers varies among different fuel types, and how these variations were linked with fuel consumption and fire severity for each layer to quantify and compare atmospheric pollutant emissions (CO2, CO, CH4 and PM2.5) in pine (Pinus halepensis) and oak (Quercus suber) forests. Our analysis was carried out in the Jonquera wildfire in Northeast Spain, which burned 10,264 ha. Pre-fire fuel loading among fuel types in pine and oak forests showed different vertical distributions despite, having similar fire-type patterns. Pine forests had a higher percentage of crown and shrub fuel loading for all fuel. In contrast, oak forests had more litter than pine forest. Fuel types characterized by large trees and low densities had the lowest fire severity in both forest types. Pine forests were more resistant to the effects of surface fires than oak forests due to their taller trees, which allowed them to withstand high-intensity surface fires with less tree damage. However, these fires have resulted in higher surface fuel consumption in pine forests. Fuel types with more vertical and horizontal continuity experienced higher fire severity and fuel consumption (72–85% of high severity). Fire severity rather than species or fuel type was the primary factor influencing pollutant emissions. Emissions of CO2 and CH4 were higher in pine than in oak forests especially at lower severities, while at intermediate and higher severity oak forests emitted more CO and PM2.5. Although remote sensing technologies are useful for fuel loading and wildfire severity assessments, field data are essential for accurately quantifying fuel consumption across fuel types and layers.

Key words: Fuel loading, Fuel consumption, Forest structure, Pinus halepensis, Quercus suber, Pyrogenic emissions