Variation and Selection of Growth Character on the Young Third Generation of Pinus massoniana

doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2017.02.015

Abstract

Abstract: We analyzed the genetic parameters, breeding value, accumulation and distribution of 2-year raw biomass with a half diallel cross among 6×6 on three generation young growth period of forest on Laoshan farm in Zhejiang Province. There were significant genetic differences among the tree height, ground diameter, crown breadth and number of living branch in the young period of Pinus massoniana. There were also significant genetic differences in the period of 2-year biomass between different hybrid combinations. The ground biomass accounted for 87.17% of the total plant biomass in 2-year hybrid combination. The height growth was the largest in the young period of tree growth trait. The height growth was increased by 4.23 times from 5 to 2 years. According to method of comprehensive breeding value, the tree height(H) breeding value combined with conjointly diameter(D₀), and 2 a raw stem biomass index(B_s) to choose higher survival rate of hybrid combinations. The higher survival rate combinations were 22×44, 33×22 and 40×44 based on 20% year old open pollination progenies. Based on the value of tree height and ground diameter of plant breeding, 16 number of plant were chosen accounting for 2%. The average gain were 1.07 m(tree height), 1.58 cm(ground diameter), 0.32 m(crown breadth) and 4.67(living branch number), respectively.

Key words: Pinus massoniana, biomass, growth, breeding value

CLC Number:

S718.46

ZHANG Zhen, YU Qi-Xin, TENG Guo-Xin, JIN Guo-Qing, FENG Zhong-Ping, ZHOU Zhi-Chun. Variation and Selection of Growth Character on the Young Third Generation of Pinus massoniana[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2017, 37(2): 266-273.

References

1. Cotterill P P,Dean C A. Successful tree breeding with index selection[M]. Melbourne:National Library of Australia Cataloguing,1990.
2. 马浩,张冬梅,李荣幸,等. 泡桐属植物育种值预测方法的研究[J]. 林业科学,2003,39(1):75-80.Ma H,Zhang D M,Li R X,et al. Study on predicting method of breeding values in Paulownia[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2003,39(1):75-80.
3. White T L,Thomas A W,Neale D B. Forest genetics[M]. Wallingford,London:CAB International,2007.
4. 孙晓梅,杨秀艳. 林木育种值预测方法的应用与分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2011,33(2):65-71.Sun X M,Yang X Y. Applications and analysis of methods for breeding value prediction in forest trees[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2011,33(2):65-71.
5. 金国庆,秦国峰,刘伟宏,等. 马尾松测交系杂交子代生长性状遗传分析[J]. 林业科学,2008,44(1):70-76.Jin G Q,Qin G F,Liu W H,et al. Genetic analysis of growth traits on tester strain progeny of Pinus massoniana[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2008,44(1):70-76.
6. 谭小梅,金国庆,周志春. 马尾松3代种质苗高生长参数的配合力分析[J]. 林业科学研究,2011,24(5):663-667.Tan X M,Jin G Q,Zhou Z C. Combining ability analysis on seedling shoot elongation and growth parameters for the third generation germplasm of Pinus massoniana[J]. Forest Research,2011,24(5):663-667.
7. 周志春,金国庆,秦国峰,等. 马尾松纸浆材重要经济性状配合力及杂种优势分析[J]. 林业科学,2004,40(4):52-57.Zhou Z C,Jin G Q,Qin G F,et al. Analysis on combining ability and heterosis of main economic traits of Pinus massoniana for pulp production[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2004,40(4):52-57.
8. Balocchi C E,Bridgwater F E,Zobel B J,et al. Age trends in genetic parameters for tree height in a nonselected population of loblolly pine[J]. Forest Science,1993,39(2):231-251.
9. Huang M,Chen L Y,Chen Z Q. Diallel analysis of combining ability and heterosis for yieldand yield components in rice by using positive loci[J]. Euphytica,2015,205(1):37-50.
10. Worku M,Banziger M,Friesen D,et al. Relative importance of general combining ability and specific combining ability among tropical maize(Zea mays L.) inbreds under contrasting nitrogen environments[J]. Maydica,2008,53:279-288.
11. 张振,张含国,张磊. 红松自由授粉子代家系生产力年度变异与家系选择[J]. 植物研究,2016,36(2):305-309.Zhang Z,Zhang H G,Zhang L. Age variations in productivity and family selection of open-pollinated families of Korean pine(Pinus koraiensis)[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2016,36(2):305-309.
12. 金国庆,秦国峰,刘伟宏. 不同林龄马尾松的种源选择效果[J]. 林业科学,2011,47(2):39-45.Jin G Q,Qin G F,Liu W H. Provenance selection effect at different stand age of Pinus massoniana[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2011,47(2):39-45.
13. 刘青华,周志春,范辉华,等. 马尾松产脂力与生长性状的家系变异及优良家系早期选择[J]. 林业科学研究,2013,26(6):686-691.Liu Q H,Zhou Z C,Fan H H,et al. Variation for oleoresin yielding capability and growth among families and early selection for superior families in Pinus massoniana[J]. Forest Research,2013,26(6):686-691.
14. 周全连,杨章旗,覃开展. 马尾松自由授粉子代测定及优良家系选择[J]. 广西科学,2001,8(1):63-65.Zhou Q L,Yang Z Q,Qin K Z. Open pollination progeny test and selection of good families in Pinus massoniana[J]. Guangxi Sciences,2001,8(1):63-65.
15. 丁贵杰,王鹏程. 马尾松人工林生物量及生产力变化规律研究Ⅱ. 不同林龄生物量及生产力[J]. 林业科学研究,2001,15(1):54-60.Ding G J,Wang P C. Study on change laws of biomass and productivity of masson pine forest plantation Ⅱ. Biomass and productivity of stand at different ages[J]. Forest Research,2001,15(1):54-60.
16. 周志春,戴德升,吴吉富,等. 不同磷营养环境下马尾松优良种源的抽梢行为[J]. 林业科学研究,2001,14(1):54-59.Zhou Z C,Dai D S,Wu J F,et al. Shoot growth behavior of superior Masson pine provenances under different phosphorus environment[J]. Forest Research,2001,14(1):54-59.
17. 续九如. 林木数量遗传学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2006.Xu J R. Quantitative genetics in forestry[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press,2006.
18. Boldman K G,Kriese L A,Van Vleck L D,et al. A Manual for Use of MTDFREML[M]. U. S. Department of Agriculture:Agricultural Research Service,1995.
19. 周志春,金国庆,周世水. 马尾松自由授粉家系生长和材质的遗传分析及联合选择[J]. 林业科学研究,1994,7(3):263-268.Zhou Z C,Jin G Q,Zhou S S. Genetic analysis and combined selection for growth and wood quality of open-pollinated families of Masson pine[J]. Forest Research,1994,7(3):263-268.
20. Park Y S,Gerhold H D. Population hybridization in Scotch pine(Pinus sylvestris L.) I. Genetic variance components and heterosis[J]. Silvae Genetica,1986,35(4):159-165.
21. Baltunis B S,Wu H X,Dungey H S,et al. Comparisons of genetic parameters and clonal value predictions from clonal trials and seedling base population trials of radiata pine[J]. Tree Genetics & Genomes,2009,5(1):269-278.
22. Sluder E R. Results at age 15 years from a half-diallel cross among 10 loblolly pines selected for resistance to fusiform rust(Cronartium quercuum f. sp. Fusiforme)[J]. Silvae Genetica,1993,42(4-5):223-230.
23. 齐明. 杉木育种中GCA与SCA的相对重要性[J]. 林业科学研究,1996,9(5):498-503.Qi M. Relative lmportance of GCA and SCA in Genstic breeding of Chinese fir[J]. Forest Research,1996,9(5):498-503.
24. 王赵民,陈益泰. 杉木主要生长性状配合力分析及杂种优势的利用[J]. 林业科学研究,1988,1(6):614-624.Wang Z M,Chen Y T. An analysis on the combining ability of main growth character in Chinese fir and the application of its Heterosis[J]. Forest Research,1988,1(6):614-624.
25. 李力,施季森,陈孝丑,等. 杉木两水平双列杂交亲本配合力分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报,2000,24(5):9-13.Li L,Shi J S,Chen X C,et al. Combining ability analyses of parents in two-level diallel cross experiment of Chinese Fir[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University,2000,24(5):9-13.
26. 赵颖,周志春,金国庆. 马尾松苗木生长和根系性状的GCA/SCA及磷素环境影响[J]. 林业科学,2009,46(6):27-33.Zhao Y,Zhou Z C,Jin G Q. GCA SCA of seedling growth and root parameters in Pinus massoniana and the phosphorus environment influence[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2009,46(6):27-33.
27. Wu H X,Powell M B,Yang J L,et al. Efficiency of early selection for rotation-aged wood quality traits in radiata pine[J]. Annals of Forest Science,2007,64(1):1-9.
28. Kumar S,Lee J. Age-age correlations and early selection for end-of-rotation wood density in radiata pine[J]. Forest Genetics,2002,9(4):323-330.
29. 刘天颐,杨会肖,刘纯鑫,等. 火炬松基因资源的育种值预测与选择[J]. 林业科学,2014,50(8):60-67.Liu T Y,Yang H X,Liu C X,et al. Prediction of breeding values and selection to the gene resources of loblolly pine[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2014,50(8):60-67.
30. Bridgwater F E,Willums C G,Canpbell R G. Patterns of leader elongation in loblolly pine families[J]. Forest Sciences,1985,31(4):933-944.
31. Xiang B,Li B L. Best linear unbiased prediction of clonal breeding values and genetic values from full-sib mating designs[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2003,33(10):2036-2043.
32. 黄永权,钟伟华,廖文莉,等. 火炬松优良家系抽梢生长的调查研究[J]. 福建林业科技,2006,33(4):142-151.Huang Y Q,Zhong W H,Liao W L,et al. Study on sprouting growth of superior families of Pinus taeda[J]. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology,2006,33(4):142-151.
33. White T L,Hodge G R. Predicting breeding values with applications in forest tree improvement[M]. Netherlands:Springer,1989.
34. Politov D V,Belokon M M,Maluchenko O P,et al. Genetic evidence of natural hybridization between siberian stone pine,Pinus sibirica du tour,and dwarf Siberian pine,P. pumila(Pall.) Regel[J]. Forest Genetics,1999,6(1):41-48.

[1]	Zhiqi CHEN, Haina ZHANG, Jiali LIU, Xianghui LU, Baocheng YANG. Effects of Nitrogen Addition on Root Growth, Biomass Allocation and Non-structural Carbohydrate Content of Cinnamomum bodinier Seedlings in Rare Earth Tailings [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2024, 44(1): 86-95.
[2]	Jing ZHANG, Weixi ZHANG, Changjun DING, Zhengsai YUAN, Lirui DAI, Xiaohua SU, Yingbai SHEN, Guanzheng QU. Comparative Analysis of Growth, Photosynthetic Physiology and Root Tip Ion Flow Characteristics of Five Poplar Varieties [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2024, 44(1): 96-106.
[3]	Tianmeng REN, Yu BAO, Yaxun SU, Qingbin CHEN, Liying WEI, Ruoxuan JI, Xiao YU, Xinli XIA, Weilun YIN, Chao LIU. Effects of Different Pruning Treatments on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of 10-year-old Triploid Populus tomentosa [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(6): 846-856.
[4]	Fazhi FANG, Huiying GUI, Zhaojia LI, Xiaofeng ZHANG. Physiological Adaptation of Six Mangrove Seedlings to Different Salinity [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(6): 881-889.
[5]	Chaoyang MA, Tianfeng LIU, Xiaoxue LI, Cancan HUO, Lingling FU, Zailiu LI. Interannual Changes in the Effects of Soil Gravel Content on the Growth and Physiology of Handeliodendron bodinieri Seedlings [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(6): 890-899.
[6]	Jiaxing CHEN, Shu WANG, Linli CHEN, Xiali HOU, Qingzhu YANG, Renya YIN. Effects of Drought Conditions on Interspecific Interactions and Growth of Bidens pilosa and Buddleja lindleyana [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(5): 720-728.
[7]	Jikang XU, Yanhong HE, Tingyan LIU, Longfei HAO, Shengxi ZHANG, Zhaoyi LI. Characteristics of Rhizosphere Soil Microecological Environment of Different Ecological Restoration Vegetation in Arsenic Sandstone Areas [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(4): 531-539.
[8]	Sheng ZHENG, Haixia GAO, Min SU, Shanghuan LU, Tengguo ZHANG, Guofan WU. Exogenous Sucrose Affected AtKEA1 and AtKEA2 to Regulate Root Growth of Seedling in Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(4): 562-571.
[9]	Li CAO, Yunli YANG, Tianfang LI, Jing JIANG. Analysis on Leaf Color and Growth Variation of Transgenic BpGLK Betula pendula ‘Dalecarlica' [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(3): 351-360.
[10]	Yingying TANG, Chuanchao GUO, Dang SHI, Nanlin JIANG, Zheng XU, Liqiang LIU. Effects of Pulp and Buried Depth on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Armeniaca vulgaris [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(2): 251-260.
[11]	Kenian LINGHU, Shu WANG. Responses of Biomass Allocation to Population Density and Soil Water in Abutilon theophrasti at Different Growth Stages [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(2): 272-280.
[12]	Jun SUN, Guisheng LI. Sequencing and Analysis of miRNAs in Vegetative and Reproductive Growths of Ceratopteris pteridoides [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(6): 1014-1022.
[13]	Ying LIU, Jiayi WU, Ling JIN, Qianru JI, Yujie FU, Dewen LI. Effects of Exogenous NO on Soil Nutrient Content and Seedling Growth Characteristics from Potted Catharanthus roseus under Light-shading Stress [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(6): 1088-1095.
[14]	Xiaolu CAO, Qiaozhu ZHAO, Hua XING, Mengfei LI. Anatomical Structure of Seed and Morphological Character at Different Germination Stages of Sinopodophyllum hexandrum [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(5): 746-752.
[15]	Huan WANG, Yunfei XU, Yibo LIU, Qinsong LIU, Wenjuan XU, Yun LONG, Xiao XU. Allelopathic Effects on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Brassica pekinensi, Caused by Water Extracts of Branches and Leaves from Davidia involucrata and Bothrocaryum controversum [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(5): 866-875.