桃儿七属的命名学考订

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

桃儿七属（Sinopodophyllum）是中国-喜马拉雅地区特有的单型属，仅桃儿七（Shexandrum）一种。桃儿七的根茎和果实均具有较高的药用价值，人类的过度采挖和种群恢复较慢使其种群数量急剧下降，现已被列入《中国物种红色名录》。在近年来的一些研究论文中，学名Shexandrum和Semodi常被混用，这使得有必要考证桃儿七学名的命名学历史，确认正确的学名使用。查阅原始文献发现，Shexandrum的基名Podophyllum hexandrum Royle发表于1834年，而Semodi的基名Podophyllum emodi Wall. ex Honigberger到1852年才合格发表（大多数学者认为是Hooker和Thomson在1855年合格发表），因此，名称Shexandrum比名称Semodi具有优先权。名称的混乱起于1979年应俊生建立桃儿七属时，他提出组合“Semodi (Wall.) Ying”作为桃儿七的学名。另外，由于他未引证Honigberger或Hooker和Thomson的文献信息，所以组合“Semodi”没有被合格发表（规则415）。随后，1985年出版的《西藏植物志》桃儿七属中，应俊生发现之前的错误并采用名称“Shexandrum”取代了“Semodi”。遗憾的是他虽然意识到该名称是新组合，但未引证基名Phexandrum合格发表的文献信息，使得组合“Shexandrum (Rolye) Ying”没有被合格发表。近年来出版的《云南植物志》、《青海植物志》、《中国植物》和《Flora of China》均未发现该错误，一直认为“Shexandrum (Rolye) Ying”合格发表时间是1985。实际上，在1993年由于编写格式要求，应俊生在王文采和武素功主编的《横断山区维管束植物》中引证了基名合格发表的文献信息。因此，该名称的合格发表时间是1993年，而不是常认为的1985年。

关键词: 小檗科, 命名学, 桃儿七属, 桃儿七

Abstract:

The genus Sinopodophyllum was validly published in 1979 under Article 401 & 403, although the combination “Semodi (Wall) Ying” was not validated contrary to Article 415. The only species Shexandrum (≡Phexandrum) was validly published by T.S. Ying in 1993, not in 1985.

Key words: Berberidaceae, Nomenclature, Sinopodophyllum, Sinopodophyllum hexandrum

中图分类号:

Q 949

郁文彬. 桃儿七属的命名学考订[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(01): 37-40.

YU Wen-Bin. Nomenclatural Clarifications of Sinopodophyllum (Berberidaceae)[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(01): 37-40.

参考文献

Bao SY (包士英), 1997. Berberidaceae［A］. In: Wu CY (吴征镒) (ed.), Flora Yunnanica, Volume 7 (云南植物志, 第7卷) ［M］. Beijing: Science Press, 7: 1—90
Browicz K, 1973. Podophyllaceae［A］. In: Rechinger KH (ed.), Flora Iranica, Volume 101 ［M］. Graz: Akademische Drucku. Verlagsanstalt, 101: 1—15
Chatterjee R, 1953. Studies on Indian Berberidaceae from botanical, chemical and pharmacological aspects［J］. Records of the Botanical Survey of India, 16: 1—86
Chinses Pharmacopoeia Commission (国家药典编委会), 2010. Pharmacopoeia of the People′s Republic of China 2010 (Part I) (中华人民共和国药典2010版, 一部) ［M］. Beijing: China Medical Science and Technology Press
Honigberger JM, 1852. ThirtyFive Years in the East (Volume II) ［M］. London: H. Baillière
Hooker JD, Thomson T, 1855. Flora Indica, Volume 1 (Part II) ［M］. London: W. Pamplin
Kong Y, Xiao JJ, Meng SC et al., 2010. A new cytotoxic flavonoid from the fruit of Sinopodophyllum hexandrum［J］. Fitoterapia, 81: 367—370
McNeill J, Barrie FR, Buck WR et al. eds, 2012. International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code)［M］. Adopted by the eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011 (Regnum Vegetabile, 154). Ruggell: A. R. G. Gantner Verlag
Royle JF, 1834. Illustrations of the Botany and other Branches of the Natural History of the Himalayan Mountains and of the Flora of Cashmere (Part II) ［M］. London: Wm. H. Allen and Co
SelivanovaGorodkova E, 1969. On two Himalayan species of Podophyllum L.［J］. Botanicheskii Zhurnal (Moscow & Leningrad), 54: 1604—1605
Shaw JMH, 2009. New combinations for the varieties of Sinopodophyllum hexandrum［J］. Hanburyana, 4: 33—39
Soejarto DD, Faden RB, Farnsworth NR, 1979. Indian Podophyllum: Is it Podophyllum emodi or Podophyllum hexandrum［J］. Taxon, 28: 549—551
Soejarto DD, Greenwood BD, Lauener LA et al., 1981. Typification of Podophyllum hexandrum Royle［J］. Taxon, 30: 652—656
Sprague TA, 1920. Podophyllum emodi, var. chinense, Western China［J］. Curtis′s Botanical Magazine, 146: Tab. 8850
Sun YJ, Li ZL, Chen H et al., 2011. Three new cytotoxic aryltetralin lignans from Sinopodophyllum emodi［J］. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 21: 3794—3797
Wallich N, 1829. Numerical List of Dried Specimens of Plants in the Museum of the Honl［M］. London
Wang S (汪松), Xie Y (谢焱), 2004. China Species Red List (Red List), Volume 1 (中国物种红色名录, 第1卷) ［M］. Beijing: Higher Education Press
Ying TS (应俊生), 1979. On Dysosma Woodson and Sinopodophyllum Ying, gen. nov. of the Berberidaceae［J］. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica (植物分类学报), 17: 15—23
Ying TS (应俊生), 1985. Berberidaceae［A］. In: Wu ZY (吴征镒) (ed.), Flora of Xizang, Volume 2 (西藏植物志, 第2卷) ［M］. Beijing: Science Press, 2: 118—155
Ying TS (应俊生), 1993. Berberidaceae［A］. In: Wang WT (王文采), Wu SG (武素功) (eds.), Vascular Plants of the Hengduan Mountains (Part I) (横断山地区维管植物, 上册) ［M］. Beijing: Science Press, 549—562
Ying TS (应俊生), 2001. Berberidaceae［A］. In: Ying TS (应俊生) (ed.), Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, Volume 29 (中国植物志, 第29卷) ［M］. Beijing: Science Press, 29: 50—305
Ying TS, Boufford DE, Brach AR, 2011. Sinopodophyllum T.S. Ying［A］. In: Wu ZY, Raven P, Hong DY (eds.), Flora of China, Volume 19 ［M］. Beijing & St. Louis: Science Press & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 19: 783
Zhang QY, Jiang M, Zhao CQ et al., 2005. Apoptosis induced by one new podophyllotoxin glucoside in human carcinoma cells［J］. Toxicology, 212: 46—53
Zhao CQ, Zhu YY, Chen SY et al., 2011. Lignan glucoside from Sinopodophyllum emodi and its cytotoxic activity［J］. Chinese Chemical Letters, 22: 181—184
Zhou LH (周立华), 1997. Berberidaceae［A］. In: Liu SW (刘尚武) (ed.), Flora of Qinghai, Volume 1 (青海植物志, 第1卷) ［M］. Xining: Qinghai People′s Publishing House, 1: 370—381
Zhou Y, Jiang SY, Ding LS et al., 2008. Chemical fingerprinting of medicinal plants “Guijiu” by LCESI multiplestage MS［J］. Chromatographia, 68: 781—789


[1]	张明英1、2、3, 陆露1、2, 李德铢1、2, 王红1、2. 小檗科的花粉演化[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(01): 1-12.
[2]	何顺志徐文芬. 贵州淫羊藿属一新种[J]. Plant Diversity, 2003, 25(03): 1-3.
[3]	李德株，郭振华. 云南竹亚科一些属种的增订[J]. Plant Diversity, 2000, 22(01): 1-3.
[4]	马绍宾;胡志浩. 小檗科鬼臼亚科的地理分布与系统发育[J]. Plant Diversity, 1997, 19(01): 1-3.
[5]	马绍宾；胡志浩. 小檗科鬼臼亚科植物的核型研究[J]. Plant Diversity, 1996, 18(03): 1-3.
[6]	李林初. 六角莲及其近缘的核型和演化的研究[J]. Plant Diversity, 1986, 8(04): 1-3.