Integrative Biology Journals

JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 1-.DOI: 10.1007/s11676-025-01882-3

• Original Paper •    

Beyond bark thickness: multifunctional explanations for variations in relative bark allocation in temperate forest trees

Huabin Zhao1,2, Zhecheng Liu1,2, Yichen Duan1,2, Yongjie Han1,2, Luna Zhang1,2, Xue Sun3, Chuankuan Wang1,2, Xingchang Wang1,2   

  1. 1Institute of Carbon Neutrality, Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management-Ministry of Education, School of Ecology, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, People’s Republic of China 

    2Heilongjiang Maoershan Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, School of Ecology, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, People’s Republic of China 

    3The Social Work Department of the Jianshan District Committee, Shuangyashan 155100, People’s Republic of China

  • Received:2025-01-22 Accepted:2025-04-09 Online:2025-06-21 Published:2025-01-01
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171765).

Abstract: While the fire protection function of tree bark has been extensively documented, other critical functions, including storage and mechanical support, have received less attention. In this study we examined: (1) the allometry of bark thickness (and biomass) against wood radius (and biomass) at a disc level, (2) differences in bark allocation between the ratio and the regression approaches, (3) differences between bark thickness and biomass as metrics of bark allocation, and (4) how bark allocation is associated with the evolution of wood from non-porous to diffuse-porous and ring-porous types. Thickness and biomass of bark and wood were measured using trunk discs of 88 individual trees of 36 species in a temperate forest characterized by a long fire interval. Allometric relationships of bark thickness (and biomass) against wood radius (and biomass) explained why both relative bark thickness and biomass decreased with increasing stem diameter. Variations in both among species varied by factors of 3.5 to 7.5 depending on the measurement methods. The ratio approach produced higher estimates of both relative bark thickness and biomass compared to the regression approach, while relative bark thickness was significantly lower than relative bark biomass. Ring-porous species exhibited higher bark thickness based on the ratio approach, which might reflect evolutionary adaptations where ring-porous species have developed thicker bark as protection: thermal insulation against freeze–thaw embolism coupled with carbohydrate reservoirs for hydraulic repair. The regression slope of bark allocation against wood density increased along the wood porosity gradient, demonstrating evolutionary biomechanical coordination between bark and wood. These findings highlight systematic coupling between bark and xylem multifunctionality.

Key words: Bark thickness, Stem diameter, Relative bark thickness, Relative bark biomass, Bark allocation