中国水青冈属 （壳斗科） 叶结构及分类学意义

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

叶结构对壳斗科(Fagaceae)现存植物和化石的鉴定具有重要意义。通过对水青冈属5种植物叶结构特征进行细致的研究，结果发现水青冈属植物叶脉有羽状弓形脉、羽状半达缘脉两种类型；三级脉有波状对生贯穿、互生贯穿及混合贯穿三种类型；小脉缺失、简单无分支或一次分支；脉间区发育良好，网眼有三边形、四边形和五边形三种类型，排列规则；具齿种类叶齿由齿主脉和齿侧脉构成，齿侧脉环状。研究结果表明水青冈属二级脉与更高级脉序形成的结构稳定且存在种间差异，具重要分类学价值。基于水青冈属叶结构特征观察结果，本次研究编制了水青冈属植物的分种检索表；参照已有研究结果并结合重要外部形态学特征，编制了壳斗科相关类群分属检索表。

关键词: 壳斗科, 水青冈属, 叶结构, 分类学意义

Abstract:

Leaf architecture is a key diagnostic feature used to identify both fossil and extant plants. This is especially true in the Fagaceae. In this paper, we report a comprehensive study of leaf architectures of five species of Fagus (Fagaceae) in China. Our results show that venation pattern is restricted to the semicraspedodromous and brochidodromous types, tertiary veins are sinuous opposite percurrent, alternate percurrent, and mixed percurrent, and that veinlets are absent or unbranched or branched once. Areoles are well developed and of irregular triangle, quadrangle and pentagonum in shape. They are regularly arranged and a tooth is formed by the principal and accessory veins, with the tooth accessory vein being looped. Leaf margins are sinuous or sinuous with teeth. Our results also indicated that the secondary vein and higher level vein features were stable characters, that differed among the five species. They could be used, therefore, as important diagnostic features for identifying these species. Based on the differences and similarities of leaf architectures, keys used to identify Fagus species in China were revised. Moreover, based on a comparison of our results with those of former leaf anatomy studies in the Fagaceae, a key based on leaf architecture of Fagaceae genera was also revised.

Key words: Fagaceae, Fagus, Leaf architecture, Taxonomic significance

中图分类号:

Q 944
Q 949

曹小燕, 曹明, 邓敏. 中国水青冈属（壳斗科）叶结构及分类学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(01): 1-6.

CAO Xiao-Yan, CAO Ming, DENG Min. Leaf Architecture and Its Taxonomic Significance in Fagus (Fagaceae) within China*[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(01): 1-6.

参考文献

李浩敏, 1987. 叶结构分析—鉴定被子植物叶化石的新方法［A］. 古生物研究的新技术和新方法［M］. 北京: 科学出版社, 54—62

谢淦, 王宇飞, 王青等译 (Ellis B, Daly DC, Hickey LJ et al., 2009), 2012. 叶结构手册 (Manual of Leaf Architecture) ［M］. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1—224

Cao M (曹明), Cao LM (曹丽敏), Zhang DX (张奠湘) et al., 2009. Leaf architecture of Zanthoxylum (Rataceae) from China and its taxonomic significance［J］. Guihaia (广西植物), 29 (2): 163—170

Ellis B, Daly DC, Hickey LJ et al., 2009. Manual of Leaf Architecture［M］. New York: Cornell University Press

Fotjanova LI, 1988. Flora dalniego vostoka na rubeshe paleogena i neogena (na primere Sakhalina i Kamchatki) ［M］. Moscow: Nauka

Grímsson F, Denk T, 2005. Fagus from the Miocene of Iceland: systematics and biogeographical considerations［J］. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 134 (1): 27—54

Hickey LJ, 1973. Classification of the Architecture of dicotyledonous leaves［J］. American Journal of Botany, 60 (1): 17—33

Hickey LJ, Wolfe JA, 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: vegetative morphology［J］. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 62: 538—589

Hickey LJ, Daylor DW, 1991. The leaf architecture of Ticodendron and the application of foliar characters in discerning its relationships［J］. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 78: 105—130

Hong BG (洪必恭), An SQ (安树青), 1993. Preliminary studies on the geographic distribution of Fagus in China［J］. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 35 (3): 229—233

Huang CJ, Zhang YT, Bartholomew B, 1999. Fagaceae［A］. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH (eds.), Flora of China［M］. Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 4: 314—315

Hummel A, 1983. The Pliocene Leaf Flora from Ruszów Near Z′ary in Lower Silesia, SW Poland［M］. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa geologiczne

Iljinskaja IA, 1982. Fagus L.［A］. In: Takhtajan AL (ed.), Magnoliophyta Fossilia SSSR［M］. Leninggrad: Nauka, 2: 60—73

Li HM (李浩敏), Hickey LJ, 1988. Leaf architecture and systematics of the Hamamelidaceae sensu lato［J］. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica (植物分类学报), 26 (2): 96—110

Li JQ (李建强), 1996a. The origin and distribution of the family Fagaceae［J］. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica (植物分类学报), 34 (4): 376—396

Li JQ (李建强), 1996b. On the phylogeny of the Fagaceae［J］. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica (植物分类学报), 34 (6): 597—609

Luo Y, Zhou ZK, 2002. Leaf architecture in Quercus subgenus Cyclobalanopsis (Fagaceae) from China［J］. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 140: 283—295

Manchester SR, Dillhoff RM, 2004. Fagus (Fagaceae) fruits, foliage, and pollen from the middle Eocene of Pacific northwestern North America［J］. Canadian Journal of Botany, 82 (10): 1509—1517

Smiley CJ, Huggins LM, 1981. Pseudofagus idahoensis n. gen. et sp. (Fagaceae) from the Miocene Clarkia Flora of Idaho［J］. American Journal of Botany, 68: 741—761

Sun H (孙航), Chen J (陈介), Zhou ZK (周浙昆) et al., 1991. The leaf architecture and its taxonomic significance in genera Albizia and Cylindrokeluhpa from China［J］. Acta Botanica Yunnanica (云南植物研究), 13 (3): 241—253

Yu CH (喻诚鸿), Chen ZL (陈泽濂), 1991. Leaf Architecture［M］. Beijing: International academic publisher, 165—176

Zhang YT (张永田), 1966. Ad stadium specierum sinensium Fagi L［J］. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica (植物分类学报), 11 (2): 115—128

Zhou ZK, Wilkinson H, Wu ZY, 1995. Taxonomical and evolutionary implications of the leaf anatomy and architecture of Quercus L. subgenus Quercus from China［J］. Cathaya, 7: 1—34

[1]	杨晨璇, 陈丽, 王娟, 杨宇明, 李璐. 中国特有属藤山柳属 (猕猴桃科) 的花粉形态及其分类学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(05): 569-577.
[2]	王东超1、2, 杨永平1、3, 陈家辉1、3, 李馨4. 28种柳属植物的叶表皮微形态特征及其分类学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(5): 430-442.
[3]	陈家辉1 , 2 , 孙航1 , 杨永平1 . 柳属的叶表皮微形态特征及其分类学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2008, 30(01): 38-46.
[4]	陈文允, 纪运恒, 邓敏, 陈绍田, 周浙昆. 西畴青冈———贵州壳斗科一新记录种[J]. Plant Diversity, 2007, 29(04): 395-396.
[5]	孙成仁. 五味子属植物种子形态求真及其分类学意义辨析[J]. Plant Diversity, 2006, 28(04): 383-393.
[6]	普春霞　周浙昆　罗艳　　　. 中国栎属(壳斗科)基于叶表皮及叶结构特征的分支分析[J]. Plant Diversity, 2002, 24(06): 1-3.
[7]	周志宏　杨崇仁　李玛玲　陈国珍　陈植和　 . 栓皮栎虫瘿的酚性成分及其生物活性[J]. Plant Diversity, 2001, 23(01): 1-3.
[8]	李丽. 部分国产半夏属植物的微形态特征和同工酶分析及其分类学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 1999, 21(04): 1-3.
[9]	陈月琴,唐绍清,何家完,庄丽,屈良鹄. 蓝藻 Oscillatoriaceae rDNA16S－23S基因间隔区的序列分析及其分类学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 1999, 21(01): 1-3.
[10]	雷立公；梁汉兴. 胡椒科的花粉形态及其分类学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 1998, 20(04): 1-3.
[11]	孙航,陈书坤. 绞股蓝属植物种皮微结构特征及其分类学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 1998, 20(03): 1-3.
[12]	李志敏；孙航. 滇中半湿润常绿阔叶林主要优势及常见种叶形态结构特征[J]. Plant Diversity, 1998, 20(01): 1-3.
[13]	张志耘；温洁. 国产酸浆属（茄科）的叶表皮和种皮特征及其分类学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 1996, 18(04): 1-3.
[14]	周浙昆；孙航. 西藏壳斗科订正[J]. Plant Diversity, 1996, 18(02): 1-3.
[15]	周浙昆孙航俞宏渊. 西藏壳斗科的地理分布[J]. Plant Diversity, 1995, 17(02): 1-3.