Ecological network analysis reveals complex responses of tree species life stage interactions to stand variables

doi:10.1007/s11676-023-01657-8

Abstract

Abstract:

Tree interactions are essential for the structure, dynamics, and function of forest ecosystems, but variations in the architecture of life-stage interaction networks (LSINs) across forests is unclear. Here, we constructed 16 LSINs in the mountainous forests of northwest Hebei, China based on crown overlap from four mixed forests with two dominant tree species. Our results show that LSINs decrease the complexity of stand densities and basal areas due to the interaction cluster differentiation. In addition, we found that mature trees and saplings play different roles, the first acting as “hub” life stages with high connectivity and the second, as “bridges” controlling information flow with high centrality. Across the forests, life stages with higher importance showed better parameter stability within LSINs. These results reveal that the structure of tree interactions among life stages is highly related to stand variables. Our efforts contribute to the understanding of LSIN complexity and provide a basis for further research on tree interactions in complex forest communities.

Key words: Tree interactions, Life stages, Interaction networks, Ecological complexity

Hengchao Zou, Huayong Zhang, Tousheng Huang. Ecological network analysis reveals complex responses of tree species life stage interactions to stand variables[J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2024, 35(1): 5-.

Hengchao Zou, Huayong Zhang, Tousheng Huang. [J]. 林业研究(英文版), 2024, 35(1): 5-.

References 91

1	Adler PB, Smull D, Beard KH, Choi RT, Furniss T, Kulmatiski A, Meiners JM, Tredennick AT, Veblen KE. Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition. Ecol Lett, 2018, 21(9): 1319-1329, DOI
2	Armas C, Pugnaire FI. Plant interactions govern population dynamics in a semi-arid plant community. J Ecol, 2005, 93(5): 978-989, DOI
3	Armas C, Pugnaire FI. Ontogenetic shifts in interactions of two dominant shrub species in a semi-arid coastal sand dune system. J Veg Sci, 2009, 20(3): 535-546, DOI
4	Bahram M, Harend H, Tedersoo L. Network perspectives of ectomycorrhizal associations. Fungal Ecol, 2014, 7: 70-77, DOI
5	Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw, 2015, 67(1): 1-48, DOI
6	Batool K, Niazi MA. Towards a methodology for validation of centrality measures in complex networks. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(4): e90283, DOI
7	Bechtold WA. Largest-crown-width prediction models for 53 species in the western United States. West J Appl for, 2004, 19(4): 245-251, DOI
8	Berger U, Hildenbrandt H. A new approach to spatially explicit modelling of forest dynamics: spacing, ageing and neighbourhood competition of mangrove trees. Ecol Modell, 2000, 132(3): 287-302, DOI
9	Brunner A, Forrester DI. Tree species mixture effects on stem growth vary with stand density: an analysis based on individual tree responses. For Ecol Manag, 2020, 473: 118334, DOI
10	Chaves CJN, Rossatto DR. Reducing tree density affects interactions between trees and atmospheric Tillandsia species (Bromeliaceae). Austral Ecol, 2021, 46(2): 218-227, DOI
11	Cheng XQ, Han HR, Kang FF, Song YL, Liu K. Point pattern analysis of different life stages of Quercus liaotungensis in Lingkong Mountain, Shanxi Province. China J Plant Interact, 2014, 9(1): 233-240, DOI
12	Chu C, Adler PB. Large niche differences emerge at the recruitment stage to stabilize grassland coexistence. Ecol Monogr, 2015, 85(3): 373-392, DOI
13	Damgaard C, Weiner J. It’s about time: a critique of macroecological inferences concerning plant competition. Trends Ecol Evol, 2017, 32(2): 86-87, DOI
14	Damgaard C, Weiner J. The need for alternative plant species interaction models. J Plant Ecol, 2021, 14(5): 771-780, DOI
15	De Steven D. Experiments on mechanisms of tree establishment in old-field succession: seedling survival and growth. Ecology, 1991, 72(3): 1076-1088, DOI
16	Detto M, Visser MD, Wright SJ, Pacala SW. Bias in the detection of negative density dependence in plant communities. Ecol Lett, 2019, 22(11): 1923-1939, DOI
17	Díaz-Sierra R, Verwijmeren M, Rietkerk M, de Dios VR, Baudena M. A new family of standardized and symmetric indices for measuring the intensity and importance of plant neighbour effects. Methods Ecol Evol, 2017, 8(5): 580-591, DOI
18	Ding CJ, Wang NN, Huang QJ, Zhang WX, Huang J, Yan SL, Chen BY, Liang DJ, Dong YF, Shen YB, Su XH. The importance of proleptic branch traits in biomass production of poplar in high-density plantations. J For Res, 2022, 33(2): 463-473, DOI
19	Estrada E, Higham DJ, Hatano N. Communicability betweenness in complex networks. Phys A, 2009, 388(5): 764-774, DOI
20	García-Cervigón AI, Iriondo JM, Linares JC, Olano JM. Disentangling facilitation along the life cycle: impacts of plant–plant interactions at vegetative and reproductive stages in a Mediterranean forb. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7: 129, DOI
21	Getzin S, Wiegand T, Wiegand K, He F. Heterogeneity influences spatial patterns and demographics in forest stands. J Ecol, 2008, 96(4): 807-820, DOI
22	Goldberg DE, Turkington R, Olsvig-Whittaker L, Dyer AR. Density dependence in an annual plant community: variation among life history stages. Ecol Monogr, 2001, 71(3): 423-446, DOI
23	Grilli J, Barabás G, Michalska-Smith MJ, Allesina S. Higher-order interactions stabilize dynamics in competitive network models. Nature, 2017, 548(7666): 210-213, DOI
24	Grimm V, Railsback SF. Individual-based modeling and ecology, 2005 Princeton Princeton University Press, DOI
25	Grote R. Estimation of crown radii and crown projection area from stem size and tree position. Ann for Sci, 2003, 60(5): 393-402, DOI
26	Gu L, O'Hara KL, Li WZ, Gong ZW. Spatial patterns and interspecific associations among trees at different stand development stages in the natural secondary forests on the Loess Plateau. China Ecol Evol, 2019, 9(11): 6410-6421, DOI
27	Guimaraes PR. The structure of ecological networks across levels of organization. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2020, 51(1): 433-460, DOI
28	Hamel S, Gaillard JM, Yoccoz N. Introduction to: individual heterogeneity—the causes and consequences of a fundamental biological process. Oikos, 2018, 127(5): 643-647, DOI
29	Hart SP, Freckleton RP, Levine JM. How to quantify competitive ability. J Ecol, 2018, 106(5): 1902-1909, DOI
30	He Q, Bertness MD. Extreme stresses, niches, and positive species interactions along stress gradients. Ecology, 2014, 95(6): 1437-1443, DOI
31	Hortal S, Lozano YM, Bastida F, Armas C, Moreno JL, Garcia C, Pugnaire FI. Plant-plant competition outcomes are modulated by plant effects on the soil bacterial community. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 17756, DOI
32	Ings TC, Montoya JM, Bascompte J, Blüthgen N, Brown L, Dormann CF, Edwards F, Figueroa D, Jacob U, Jones JI, Lauridsen RB, Ledger ME, Lewis HM, Olesen JM, Van Veen FJF, Warren PH, Woodward G. Review: ecological networks—beyond food webs. J Anim Ecol, 2009, 78(1): 253-269, DOI
33	Jalili M, Askari Sichani O, Yu XH. Optimal pinning controllability of complex networks: dependence on network structure. Phys Rev E, 2015, 91(1): 012803, DOI
34	Jiao JJ, Wu CP, Jiang B, Wang ZG, Yuan WG, Zhu JR, Li TT, Yang SZ, Yao LJ. Negative density restricts the coexistence and spatial distribution of dominant species in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forests in China. Forests, 2022, 13(8): 1227, DOI
35	Julliard R, Clavel J, Devictor V, Jiguet F, Couvet D. Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities. Ecol Lett, 2006, 9(11): 1237-1244, DOI
36	Kikvidze Z, Brooker RW. Quantifying plant interactions: independent reference is critical for standardising the importance indices. J Veg Sci, 2019, 30(2): 397-401, DOI
37	Kinlock NL. Uncovering structural features that underlie coexistence in an invaded woody plant community with interaction networks at multiple life stages. J Ecol, 2021, 109(1): 384-398, DOI
38	Kira T, Ogawa H, Shinozaki N. Intraspecific competition among higher plants I. Competition-yield-density interrelationship in regularly dispersed population. J Inst Poly Osa Univ Ser D, 1953, 4: 1-16
39	Kunstler G, Albert CH, Courbaud B, Lavergne S, Thuiller W, Vieilledent G, Zimmermann NE, Coomes DA. Effects of competition on tree radial-growth vary in importance but not in intensity along climatic gradients. J Ecol, 2011, 99(1): 300-312, DOI
40	Lai JS, Nimon K (2022) glmm.hp: Hierarchical partitioning of marginal R2 for generalized mixed-effect models. R package version 0.0-5
41	Liu PC, Wang WD, Bai ZQ, Guo ZJ, Ren W, Huang JH, Xu Y, Yao J, Ding Y, Zang RG. Competition and facilitation co-regulate the spatial patterns of boreal tree species in Kanas of Xinjiang, northwest China. For Ecol Manag, 2020, 467: 118167, DOI
42	Losapio G, Schöb C. Resistance of plant–plant networks to biodiversity loss and secondary extinctions following simulated environmental changes. Funct Ecol, 2017, 31(5): 1145-1152, DOI
43	Losapio G, Pugnaire FI, O'Brien MJ, Schöb C. Plant life history stage and nurse age change the development of ecological networks in an arid ecosystem. Oikos, 2018, 127(9): 1390-1397, DOI
44	Losapio G, Montesinos-Navarro A, Saiz H. Perspectives for ecological networks in plant ecology. Plant Ecol Divers, 2019, 12(2): 87-102, DOI
45	Luo Y, Chen HYH. Competition, species interaction and ageing control tree mortality in boreal forests. J Ecol, 2011, 99(6): 1470-1480, DOI
46	Martínez I, Wiegand T, González-Taboada F, Obeso JR. Spatial associations among tree species in a temperate forest community in North-western Spain. For Ecol Manag, 2010, 260(4): 456-465, DOI
47	Moeur M. Spatial models of competition and gap dynamics in old-growth Tsuga heterophylla/Thuja plicata forests. For Ecol Manag, 1997, 94(1): 175-186, DOI
48	Montgomery RA, Reich PB, Palik BJ. Untangling positive and negative biotic interactions: views from above and below ground in a forest ecosystem. Ecology, 2010, 91(12): 3641-3655, DOI
49	Morales-Castilla I, Matias MG, Gravel D, Araújo MB. Inferring biotic interactions from proxies. Trends Ecol Evol, 2015, 30(6): 347-356, DOI
50	Mougi A, Kondoh M. Diversity of interaction types and ecological community stability. Science, 2012, 337(6092): 349-351, DOI
51	Nakagawa Y, Yokozawa M, Hara T. Complex network analysis reveals novel essential properties of competition among individuals in an even-aged plant population. Ecol Complex, 2016, 26: 95-116, DOI
52	Nakagawa S, Johnson PCD, Schielzeth H. The coefficient of determination R ² and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. J R Soc Interface, 2017, 14(134): 20170213, DOI
53	Newbery DM, Stoll P. Relaxation of species-specific neighborhood effects in Bornean rain forest under climatic perturbation. Ecology, 2013, 94(12): 2838-2851, DOI
54	Perea AJ, Wiegand T, Garrido JL, Rey PJ, Alcántara JM. Legacy effects of seed dispersal mechanisms shape the spatial interaction network of plant species in Mediterranean forests. J Ecol, 2021, 109(10): 3670-3684, DOI
55	Piao TF, Comita LS, Jin GZ, Kim JH. Density dependence across multiple life stages in a temperate old-growth forest of northeast China. Oecologia, 2013, 172(1): 207-217, DOI
56	Pilosof S, Porter MA, Pascual M, Kéfi S. The multilayer nature of ecological networks. Nat Ecol Evol, 2017, 1(4): 0101, DOI
57	Pommerening A, Maleki K. Differences between competition kernels and traditional size-ratio based competition indices used in forest ecology. For Ecol Manag, 2014, 331: 135-143, DOI
58	Pranchai A, Jenke M, Vogt J, Grueters U, Yue L, Mehlig U, de Menezes MM, Wagner S, Berger U. Density-dependent shift from facilitation to competition in a dwarf Avicennia germinans forest. Wetl Ecol Manag, 2018, 26(2): 139-150, DOI
59	Pretzsch H. Canopy space filling and tree crown morphology in mixed-species stands compared with monocultures. For Ecol Manag, 2014, 327: 251-264, DOI
60	Pu XC, Jin GZ. Conspecific and phylogenetic density-dependent survival differs across life stages in two temperate old-growth forests in Northeast China. For Ecol Manag, 2018, 424: 95-104, DOI
61	Pyke DA, Archer S. Plant-plant interactions affecting plant establishment and persistence on revegetated rangeland. J Range Manag, 1991, 44(6): 550-557, DOI
62	Qi M, Sun T, Xue SF, Yang W, Shao DD, Martínez-López J. Competitive ability, stress tolerance and plant interactions along stress gradients. Ecology, 2018, 99(4): 848-857, DOI
63	R Development Core Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [WWW Document]. Available from http://www.rproject.org.
64	Raptis D, Kazana V, Kazaklis A, Stamatiou C. A crown width-diameter model for natural even-aged black pine forest management. Forests, 2018, 9(10): 610, DOI
65	Rinella MJ, Strong DJ, Vermeire LT. Omitted variable bias in studies of plant interactions. Ecology, 2020, 101(6): e03020, DOI
66	Rudolf VHW, Lafferty KD. Stage structure alters how complexity affects stability of ecological networks. Ecol Lett, 2011, 14(1): 75-79, DOI
67	Sánchez-González M, Cañellas I, Montero G. Generalized height-diameter and crown diameter prediction models for cork oak forests in Spain. For Syst, 2007, 16(1): 76-88
68	Schenk JH, Mahall BE. Positive and negative plant interactions contribute to a north–south-patterned association between two desert shrub species. Oecologia, 2002, 132(3): 402-410, DOI
69	Schiffers K, Tielbörger K. Ontogenetic shifts in interactions among annual plants. J Ecol, 2006, 94(2): 336-341, DOI
70	Schlau B, Huxman T, Mooney K, Pratt J. Facilitation at early growth stages results in spatial associations and stable coexistence in late growth stages of two long-lived, dominant shrubs. Oikos, 2021, 130(12): 2182-2190, DOI
71	Schmid JS, Taubert F, Wiegand T, Sun IF, Huth A. Network science applied to forest megaplots: tropical tree species coexist in small-world networks. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 13198, DOI
72	Soliveres S, Maestre FT, Ulrich W, Manning P, Boch S, Bowker MA, Prati D, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Quero JL, Schöning I, Gallardo A, Weisser W, Müller J, Socher SA, García-Gómez M, Ochoa V, Schulze E-D, Fischer M, Allan E. Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness. Ecol Lett, 2015, 18(8): 790-798, DOI
73	Song S, Zhang S, Wang TY, Meng J, Zhou YQ, Zhang H. Balancing conservation and development in Winter Olympic construction: evidence from a multi-scale ecological suitability assessment. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 14083, DOI
74	Strydom T, Dalla Riva GV, Poisot T. SVD entropy reveals the high complexity of ecological networks. Front Ecol Evol, 2021, 9: 623141, DOI
75	Subrahmaniam HJ, Libourel C, Journet EP, Morel JB, Muños S, Niebel A, Raffaele S, Roux F. The genetics underlying natural variation of plant–plant interactions, a beloved but forgotten member of the family of biotic interactions. Plant J, 2018, 93(4): 747-770, DOI
76	Tomiolo S, Damgaard CF, Gay L, Ronfort J, Ehlers BK. A plant growth model to test for changes in plant–plant interaction over a growing season: the case of kin competition. Oikos, 2022, 12: e09358, DOI
77	Trogisch S, Liu XJ, Rutten G, Xue K, Bauhus J, Brose U, Bu WS, Cesarz S, Chesters D, Connolly J, Cui XY, Eisenhauer N, Guo LD, Haider S, Härdtle W, Kunz M, Liu LL, Ma ZQ, Neumann S, Sang WG, Schuldt A, Tang ZY, van Dam NM, von Oheimb G, Wang MQ, Wang SP, Weinhold A, Wirth C, Wubet T, Xu XL, Yang B, Zhang NL, Zhu CD, Ma KP, Wang YF, Bruelheide H. The significance of tree-tree interactions for forest ecosystem functioning. Basic Appl Ecol, 2021, 55: 33-52, DOI
78	Wang CH, Li B. Salinity and disturbance mediate direct and indirect plant–plant interactions in an assembled marsh community. Oecologia, 2016, 182(1): 139-152, DOI
79	Weigelt A, Steinlein T, Beyschlag W. Does plant competition intensity rather depend on biomass or on species identity?. Basic Appl Ecol, 2002, 3(1): 85-94, DOI
80	Wiegand T, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N, Okuda T. Analyzing the spatial structure of a Sri Lankan tree species with multiple scales of clustering. Ecology, 2007, 88(12): 3088-3102, DOI
81	Wiegand T, Martínez I, Huth A. Recruitment in tropical tree species: revealing complex spatial patterns. Am Nat, 2009, 174(4): 106-140, DOI
82	Williams LJ, Paquette A, Cavender-Bares J, Messier C, Reich PB. Spatial complementarity in tree crowns explains overyielding in species mixtures. Nat Ecol Evol, 2017, 1(4): 0063, DOI
83	Wright M, Sherriff RL, Miller AE, Wilson T. Stand basal area and temperature interact to influence growth in white spruce in southwest Alaska. Ecosphere, 2018, 9(10): e02462, DOI
84	Xin HL, Jackson T, Cao YJ, Zhang HY, Lin Y, Shenkin A. Spatial pattern analysis of forest trees based on the vectorial mark. J For Res, 2022, 33(4): 1301-1315, DOI
85	Zambrano J, Arellano G, Swenson NG, Staniczenko PPA, Thompson J, Fagan WF. Analyses of three-dimensional species associations reveal departures from neutrality in a tropical forest. Ecology, 2022, 103(6): e3681, DOI
86	Zhang YH, Loreau M, He NP, Zhang GM, Han XG. Mowing exacerbates the loss of ecosystem stability under nitrogen enrichment in a temperate grassland. Funct Ecol, 2017, 31(8): 1637-1646, DOI
87	Zhang HS, Zha TG, Yu Y, Ji XD, Jesús RC. Assessing vegetation community distribution characteristics and succession stages in mountainous areas hosting coming Winter Olympics Games. J Mt Sci, 2021, 18(11): 2870-2887, DOI
88	Zhang HS, Yu Y, Zha TG, Jesús RC. Assessing previous land-vegetation productivity relationships on mountainous areas hosting coming Winter Olympics Games in 2022. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 788: 147870, DOI
89	Zhao CX, Zhao WJ, Jin M, Zhou JQ, Ta F, Wang L, Mou WB, Lei LJ, Liu JR, Du JL, Zhang XL. Spatial patterns of Picea crassifolia driven by environmental heterogeneity and intraspecific interactions. J For Res, 2023, 34(4): 949-962, DOI
90	Zhou Q, Shi H, Shu X, Xie FL, Zhang KR, Zhang QF, Dang HS. Spatial distribution and interspecific associations in a deciduous broad-leaved forest in north-central China. J Veg Sci, 2019, 30(6): 1153-1163, DOI
91	Zhu Y, Comita LS, Hubbell SP, Ma KP. Conspecific and phylogenetic density-dependent survival differs across life stages in a tropical forest. J Ecol, 2015, 103(4): 957-966, DOI