1 |
Abino AC, Kim SY, Lumbres RIC, Jang MN, Youn HJ, Park KH, Lee YJ. Performance of Weibull function as a diameter distribution model for Pinus thunbergii stands in the eastern coast of South Korea. J Mt Sci, 2016, 13: 822-830,
DOI
|
2 |
Anderson TW, Darling DA. A test of goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc, 1954, 49: 765-769,
DOI
|
3 |
Bailey RL, Dell TR. Quantifying diameter distributions with the Weibull function. For Sci, 1973, 19: 97-104
|
4 |
Bankston JB, Sabatia CO, Poudel KP. Effects of sample plot size and prediction models on diameter distribution recovery. For Sci, 2021, 67: 245-255,
DOI
|
5 |
Borders BE, Patterson WD. Projecting stand tables: a comparison of the Weibull diameter distribution method, a percentile-based projection method, and a basal area growth projection method. For Sci, 1990, 36: 413-424
|
6 |
Bullock BP, Burkhart HE. Juvenile diameter distributions of loblolly pine characterized by the two-parameter Weibull function. New for, 2005, 29: 233-244,
DOI
|
7 |
Burkhart HE, Tomé M. Modeling forest trees and stands, 2012 Berlin Springer,
DOI
|
8 |
Cao QV. Predicting parameters of a Weibull function for modeling diameter distribution. For Sci, 2004, 50: 682-685
|
9 |
Cao QV, McCarty SM (2006) New methods for estimating parameters of Weibull functions to characterize future diameter distributions in forest stands. In: Proceedings of the 13th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. Gen Tech Rep SRS–92. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. Asheville, U.S.
|
10 |
Dong L, Zhang L, Li F. Developing two additive biomass equations for three coniferous plantation species in northeast China. Forests, 2016, 7: 136,
DOI
|
11 |
Duan A, Zhang J, Zhang X, He C. Stand diameter distribution modelling and prediction based on Richards function. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8: e62605,
DOI
|
12 |
Egonmwan IY, Ogana FN. Application of diameter distribution model for volume estimation in Tectona grandis L.f. stands in the Oluwa forest reserve, Nigeria. Trop Plant Res, 2020, 7: 573-580,
DOI
|
13 |
Fonseca TF, Marques CP, Parresol BR. Describing maritime pine diameter distributions with Johnson’s SB distribution using a new all-parameter recovery approach. For Sci, 2009, 55: 367-373
|
14 |
Gobakken T, Næsset E. Estimation of diameter and basal area distributions in coniferous forest by means of airborne laser scanner data. Scand J for Res, 2004, 19: 529-542,
DOI
|
15 |
Gobakken T, Næsset E. Weibull and percentile models for lidar-based estimation of basal area distribution. Scand J for Res, 2005, 20: 490-502,
DOI
|
16 |
Goodwin AN. A blind spot in the use of the Weibull function for modeling diameter distributions. For Sci, 2021, 67: 125-134,
DOI
|
17 |
Gorgoso-Varela JJ, Ogana FN, Ige PO. A comparison between derivative and numerical optimization methods used for diameter distribution estimation. Scand J for Res, 2020, 35: 156-164,
DOI
|
18 |
Gorgoso-Varela JJ, Ponce RA, Rodríguez-Puerta F. Modeling diameter distributions with six probability density functions in Pinus halepensis Mill. plantations using low-density airborne laser scanning data in Aragón (northeast Spain). Remote Sens, 2021, 13: 2307,
DOI
|
19 |
Hafley WL, Schreuder HT. Statistical distributions for fitting diameter and height data in even-aged stands. Can J for Res, 1977, 7: 481-487,
DOI
|
20 |
Hao Y, Widagdo FRA, Liu X, Quan Y, Liu Z, Dong L. Estimation and calibration of stem diameter distribution using UAV laser scanning data: a case study for larch (Larix olgensis) forests in northeast China. Remote Sens Environ, 2022, 268: 112769,
DOI
|
21 |
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, 2009 2 New York Springer,
DOI
|
22 |
Jiang L, Brooks JR. Predicting diameter distributions for young longleaf pine plantations in southwest Georgia. South J Appl for, 2009, 33: 25-28,
DOI
|
23 |
Jin X, Pukkala T, Li F, Dong L. Optimal management of Korean pine plantations in multifunctional forestry. J for Res, 2017, 28: 1027-1037,
DOI
|
24 |
Jin X, Pukkala T, Li F, Dong L. Developing growth models for tree plantations using inadequate data—a case for Korean pine in Northeast China. Silva Fenn, 2019, 53: 4,
DOI
|
25 |
Leduc DJ, Matney TG, Belli KL, Baldwin VC (2001) Predicting diameter distributions of longleaf pine plantations: a comparison between artificial neural networks and other accepted methodologies. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, U.S.
|
26 |
Lindsay SR, Wood GR, Woollons RC. Stand table modelling through the Weibull distribution and usage of skewness information. For Ecol Manag, 1996, 81: 19-23,
DOI
|
27 |
Little SN. Weibull diameter distributions for mixed stands of western conifers. Can J for Res, 1983, 13: 85-88,
DOI
|
28 |
Liu C, Zhang SY, Lei Y, Newton PF, Zhang L. Evaluation of three methods for predicting diameter distributions of black spruce (Picea mariana) plantations in central Canada. Can J for Res, 2004, 34: 2424-2432,
DOI
|
29 |
Maltamo M. Comparing basal area diameter distributions estimated by tree species and for the entire growing stock in a mixed stand. Silva Fenn, 1997, 31: 1,
DOI
|
30 |
Massey FJ. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc, 1951, 46: 68-78,
DOI
|
31 |
Miguel EP, Machado SdoA, Figueiredo Filho A, Arce JE. Using the Weibull function for prognosis of yield by diameter class in Eucalyptus urophylla stands. Cerne, 2010, 16: 94-104,
DOI
|
32 |
Newton PF, Amponsah IG. Evaluation of Weibull-based parameter prediction equation systems for black spruce and jack pine stand types within the context of developing structural stand density management diagrams. Can J for Res, 2005, 35: 2996-3010,
DOI
|
33 |
Nord-Larsen T, Cao QV. A diameter distribution model for even-aged beech in Denmark. For Ecol Manag, 2006, 231: 218-225,
DOI
|
34 |
Nunes L, Pasalodos-Tato M, Alberdi I, Sequeira AC, Vega JA, Silva V, Vieira P, Rego FC. Bulk density of shrub types and tree crowns to use with forest inventories in the Iberian Peninsula. Forests, 2022, 13: 555,
DOI
|
35 |
Özçelik R, Fidalgo Fonseca TJ, Parresol BR, Eler Ü. Modeling the diameter distributions of brutian pine stands using Johnson’s SB distribution. For Sci, 2016, 62: 587-593,
DOI
|
36 |
Palahí M, Pukkala T, Trasobares A. Modelling the diameter distribution of Pinus sylvestris, Pinus nigra and Pinus halepensis forest stands in Catalonia using the truncated Weibull function. Forestry, 2006, 79: 553-562,
DOI
|
37 |
Palahí M, Pukkala T, Blasco E, Trasobares A. Comparison of beta, Johnson’s SB, Weibull and truncated Weibull functions for modeling the diameter distribution of forest stands in Catalonia (north-east of Spain). Eur J for Res, 2007, 126: 563-571,
DOI
|
38 |
Palahí M, Pukkala T, Trasobares A. The use of tree level vs. stand level data in forest planning calculations—does it really matter?. Ann for Sci, 2008, 65: 110,
DOI
|
39 |
Parresol BR (2003) Recovering parameters of Johnson’s SB distribution. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC
|
40 |
Pasalodos-Tato M, Pukkala T. Assessing fire risk in stand-level management in Galicia (north-western Spain), 2008 Toledo WIT Press 89-97
|
41 |
Pasalodos-Tato M, Pukkala T, Calama R, Cañellas I, Sánchez-González M. Optimal management of Pinus pinea stands when cone and timber production are considered. Eur J for Res, 2016, 135: 607-619,
DOI
|
42 |
Peng C. Growth and yield models for uneven-aged stands: past, present and future. For Ecol Manag, 2000, 132: 259-279,
DOI
|
43 |
Peng W, Pukkala T, Jin X, Li F. Optimal management of larch (Larix olgensis A. Henry) plantations in Northeast China when timber production and carbon stock are considered. Ann for Sci, 2018, 75: 63,
DOI
|
44 |
Pogoda P, Ochał W, Orzeł S. Modeling diameter distribution of black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.) stands in Poland. Forests, 2019, 10: 412,
DOI
|
45 |
Poudel KP, Cao QV. Evaluation of methods to predict Weibull parameters for characterizing diameter distributions. For Sci, 2013, 59: 243-252,
DOI
|
46 |
Pukkala T. Improved guidelines for any-aged forestry. J for Res, 2022, 33: 1443-1457,
DOI
|
47 |
Rennolls K, Geary DN, Rollinson TJD. Characterizing diameter distributions by the use of the Weibull distribution. Forestry, 1985, 58: 57-66,
DOI
|
48 |
Rennolls K, Wang M. A new parameterization of Johnson’s SB distribution with application to fitting forest tree diameter data. Can J for Res, 2005, 35: 575-579,
DOI
|
49 |
Reynolds MR, Burk TE, Huang WC. Goodness-of-Fit tests and model selection procedures for diameter distribution Models. For Sci, 1988, 34: 373-399
|
50 |
Schmidt LN, Sanquetta MNI, McTague JP, da Silva GF, Fraga Filho CV, Sanquetta CR, Soares Scolforo JR. On the use of the Weibull distribution in modeling and describing diameter distributions of clonal eucalypt stands. Can J for Res, 2020, 50: 1050-1063,
DOI
|
51 |
Sghaier T, Cañellas I, Calama R, Sánchez-González M. Modelling diameter distribution of Tetraclinis articulata in Tunisia using normal and Weibull distributions with parameters depending on stand variables. Iforest-Biogeosciences for, 2016, 9: 702-709,
DOI
|
52 |
Siipilehto J. Improving the accuracy of predicted basal-area diameter distribution in advanced stands by determining stem number. Silva Fenn, 1999,
DOI
|
53 |
Siipilehto J. Local prediction of stand structure using linear prediction theory in Scots pine-dominated stands in Finland. Silva Fenn, 2011, 45: 4,
DOI
|
54 |
Siipilehto J. Methods and applications for improving parameter prediction models for stand structures in Finland. Diss for, 2011, 1: 1,
DOI
|
55 |
Siipilehto J, Mehtätalo L. Parameter recovery vs. parameter prediction for the Weibull distribution validated for Scots pine stands in Finland. Silva Fenn, 2013, 47: 4,
DOI
|
56 |
Siipilehto J, Sarkkola S, Mehtätalo L. Comparing regression estimation techniques when predicting diameter distributions of Scots pine on drained peatlands. Silva Fenn, 2007, 41: 2,
DOI
|
57 |
Sun S, Cao QV, Cao T. Characterizing diameter distributions for uneven-aged pine-oak mixed forests in the Qinling Mountains of China. Forests, 2019, 10: 596,
DOI
|
58 |
Tian D, Bi H, Jin X, Li F. Stochastic frontiers or regression quantiles for estimating the self-thinning surface in higher dimensions?. J for Res, 2021, 32: 1515-1533,
DOI
|
59 |
Trasobares A, Tomé M, Miina J. Growth and yield model for Pinus halepensis Mill. in Catalonia, north-east Spain. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 203: 49-62,
DOI
|
60 |
Waldy J, Kershaw JA Jr, Weiskittel A, Ducey MJ. Diameter distribution model development of tropical hybrid Eucalyptus clonal plantations in Sumatera, Indonesia: a comparison of estimation methods. N Z J for Sci, 2022, 52: 1,
DOI
|
61 |
Weiskittel AR, Hann DW, Kershaw JA, Vanclay JK. Forest growth and yield modeling, 2011 1 New York Wiley,
DOI
|
62 |
West PW. Tamm review: Sampling to estimate the frequency distribution of tree diameters or ages across large forest areas. For Ecol Manag, 2021, 488: 118939,
DOI
|
63 |
Zellner A. An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. J Am Stat Assoc, 1962, 57: 348-368,
DOI
|
64 |
Zhang X, Lei Y. A linkage among whole-stand model, individual-tree model and diameter-distribution model. J for Sci, 2010, 56: 600-608,
DOI
|
65 |
Zhang L, Packard K, Liu C. A comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull and Johnson’s SB distributions to mixed spruce–fir stands in northeastern North America. Can J for Res, 2003, 33: 1340-1347,
DOI
|