[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

  • Roghayeh Jahdi 1, 2 ,
  • Liliana Del Giudice 1, b ,
  • Massimo Melis 3 ,
  • Raffaella Lovreglio 4 ,
  • Michele Salis 1 ,
  • Bachisio Arca 1 ,
  • Pierpaolo Duce 1
展开

收稿日期: 2021-12-30

  录用日期: 2022-04-19

  网络出版日期: 2024-10-16

Assessing the effects of alternative fuel treatments to reduce wildfire exposure

  • Roghayeh Jahdi 1, 2 ,
  • Liliana Del Giudice 1, b ,
  • Massimo Melis 3 ,
  • Raffaella Lovreglio 4 ,
  • Michele Salis 1 ,
  • Bachisio Arca 1 ,
  • Pierpaolo Duce 1
Expand
  • 1 Institute of BioEconomy (CNR IBE), National Research Council of Italy, Sassari, Italy
  • 2 Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
  • 3 Sardinia Forest Service, Lanusei, Italy
  • 4 Department of Agriculture, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy

Received date: 2021-12-30

  Accepted date: 2022-04-19

  Online published: 2024-10-16

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2022
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

本文引用格式

Roghayeh Jahdi , Liliana Del Giudice , Massimo Melis , Raffaella Lovreglio , Michele Salis , Bachisio Arca , Pierpaolo Duce . [J]. 林业研究(英文版), 2023 , 34(2) : 373 -386 . DOI: 10.1007/s11676-022-01504-2

Abstract

Effective landscape-scale fuel management strategies are essential for reducing wildfire risk in Mediterranean fire-prone areas. In this study, the minimum travel time (MTT) fire-spread algorithm as implemented in FlamMap was applied to assess the potential of alternative fuel treatments for lowering wildfire losses in a 5,740-ha study area in eastern Sardinia, Italy. Twenty-seven wildfires at 10-m resolution were simulated considering three wind speeds (15, 18, and 21 km h−1) to compare fuel treatments: no treatment (NT), irrigated agroforestry areas with shrub clearing (T1), prescribed fire in eucalyptus stands (T2), and irrigated grasslands (T3). The simulations replicated a recent large wildfire that occurred in the study area (Orrì wildfire, 2019) and considered the weather and fuel moisture conditions associated with this event. The average wildfire exposure outputs (burned area, probability of burning, conditional flame length, potential crown fire occurrence, and surfaces withflame lengths above 2.5 m) decreased after fuel treatments, compared to no treatment. T1 was the most effective strategy in mitigating wildfire hazards and provided the most significant performance for several wildfire exposure indicators. Treating only 0.5% of the study area (~ 30 ha) resulted in a decrease in all wildfire exposure metrics to ~ 10% within the study area. In addition, the total surface characterized by high flame length (average > 2.5 m) was the lowest in the T1 treatment. This study can help land and fire managers optimize fuel treatment opportunities and wildfire risk mitigation strategies in Mediterranean areas.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
1
Ager AA, Vaillant NM, Finney MA. A comparison of landscape fuel treatment strategies to mitigate wildland fire risk in the urban interface and preserve old forest structure. For Ecol Manage, 2010, 259(8): 1556-1570,

DOI

2
Ager AA, Day MA, Finney MA, Vance-Borland K, Vaillant NM. Analysing the transmission of wildfire exposure on a fire-prone landscape in oregon, USA. For Ecol Manage, 2014, 334: 377-390,

DOI

3
Ager AA, Barros AMG, Preisler HK, Day MA, Spies TA, Bailey JD, Bolte JP. Effects of accelerated wildfire on future fire regimes and implications for the United States federal fire policy. Ecol Soc, 2017, 22(4): 12,

DOI

4
Ager AA, Barros AMG, Houtman R, Seli R, Day MA. Modelling the effect of accelerated forest management on long-term wildfire activity. Ecol Model, 2020, 421,

DOI

5
Albini FA (1979) Spot fire distance from burning trees: a predictive model (Vol. 56). Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture.

6
Alcasena FJ, Salis M, Ager AA, Arca B, Molina D, Spano D. Assessing landscape scale wildfire exposure for highly valued resources in a mediterranean area. Environ Manage, 2015, 55(5): 1200-1216,

DOI

7
Alcasena FJ, Salis M, Ager AA, Castell R, Vega-García C. Assessing wildland fire risk transmission to communities in northern Spain. Forests, 2017, 8(2): 30,

DOI

8
Alcasena FJ, Ager AA, Salis M, Day MA, Vega-Garcia C. Optimizing prescribed fire allocation for managing wildfire risk in central Catalonia. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 621: 872-885,

DOI

9
Alcasena FJ, Ager AA, Bailey JD, Pineda N, Vega-García C. Towards a comprehensive wildfire management strategy for mediterranean areas: Framework development and implementation in Catalonia, Spain. J Environ Manage, 2019, 231: 303-320,

DOI

10
Alcasena FJ, Ager AA, Belavenutti P, Krawchuk M, Day MA. Contrasting the efficiency of landscape versus community protection fuel treatment strategies to reduce wildfire exposure and risk. J Environ Manage, 2022, 309,

DOI

11
Anderson HE (1982) Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behaviour. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service General Technical Report INT-122 https://doi.org/10.2737/INT-GTR-122

12
Andrews PL, Heinsch FA, Schelvan L (2011) How to generate and interpret fire characteristics charts for surface and crown fire behavior (No. 253). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-GTR-253

13
Arca B, Bacciu V, Pellizzaro G, Salis M, Ventura A, Duce P, Spano D, Brundu G. Fuel model mapping by IKONOS imagery to support spatially explicit fire simulators. 7th international workshop on advances in remote sensing in forest fire management, 2009 Italy Matera 2-5

14
Aru A, Baldaccini P, Vacca A. Nota illustrativa alla carta dei suoli della Sardegna, 1991 Cagliari STEF SpA 1-83

15
Benali AM, ACL, Pinho J, Fernandes PM, Pereira JMC. Understanding the impact of different landscape-level fuel management strategies on wildfire hazard in central Portugal. Forests, 2021, 12(5): 522,

DOI

16
Beverly JL, Leverkus SER, Cameron H, Schroeder D. Stand-level fuel reduction treatments and fire behavior in canadian boreal conifer forests. Fire, 2020, 3(3): 35,

DOI

17
Calkin DE, Cohen JD, Finney MA, Thompson MP. How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland-urban interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111(2): 746-751,

DOI

18
Calkin DE, Ager AA, Thompson MP (2011) A comparative risk assessment framework for wildland fire management: The 2010 Cohesive Strategy Science Report, Gen. Tech Rep RMRS-GTR-262 Fort Collins, CO https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-GTR-262

19
Castellnou M, Prat-Guitart N, Arilla E, Larranaga A, Nebot E, Castellarnau X, Vendrell J, Pallas J, Herrera J, Monturiol M, Cespedes J, Pages J, Gallardo C, Miralles M. Empowering strategic decision-making for wildfire management: avoiding the fear trap and creating a resilient landscape. Fire Ecol, 2019, 15(1): 1-17,

DOI

20
Chessa PA, Delitala A. Il clima della Sardegna. Collana Note Tecniche Di Agrometeorologia per la Sardegna, 1997 Sassari Chiarella 17-38

21
Cochrane MA, Moran CJ, Wimberly MC, Baer AD, Finney MA, Beckendorf KL, Eidenshink J, Zhu Z. Estimation of wildfire size and risk changes due to fuels treatments. Int J Wildland Fire, 2012, 21(4): 357-367,

DOI

22
Collins BM, Stephens SL, Roller GB, Battles JJ. Simulating fire and forest dynamics for a landscape fuel treatment project in the sierra nevada. For Sci, 2011, 57(2): 77-88,

DOI

23
Cortes-Molino A, Aullo-Maestro I, Fernandez-Luque I, Flores-Moya A, Carreira JA, Salvo AE. Using ForeStereo and LIDAR data to assess fire and canopy structure-related risks in relict abies pinsapo boiss forests. PeerJ, 2020,

DOI

24
Cruz MG, Alexander ME, Dam JE. Using modeled surface and crown fire behavior characteristics to evaluate fuel treatment effectiveness: a caution. For Sci, 2014, 60(5): 1000-1004,

DOI

25
Davim DA, Rossa CG, Fernandes PM. Survival of prescribed burning treatments to wildfire in Portugal. For Ecol Manage, 2021, 493,

DOI

26
Fernandes PM, Davies GM, Ascoli D, Fernandez C, Moreira F, Rigolot E, Stoof CR, Vega JA, Molina D. Prescribed burning in southern Europe: developing fire management in a dynamic landscape. Front Ecol Environ, 2013, 11(s1): e4-e14,

DOI

27
Fernandes PM, Loureiro C, Palheiro P, Vale-Gonçalves H, Fernandes MM, Cruz MG. Fuels and fire hazard in blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus) stands in Portugal. Boletín del CIDEU, 2011, 10: 53-61

28
Fernandez-Anez N, Krasovskiy A, Müller M, Vacik H, Baetens J, Hukic E, Solomun MK . Current Wildland Fire Patterns and Challenges in Europe: A Synthesis of National Perspectives. Air, Soil Water Res, 2021, 14(3): 117862212110281,

DOI

29
Finney MA. Fire growth using minimum travel time methods. Can J for Res, 2002, 32(8): 1420-1424,

DOI

30
Finney MA, Seli RC, McHugh CW, Ager AA, Bahro B, Agee JK. Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires. Int J Wildland Fire, 2007, 16(6): 712-727,

DOI

31
Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator–model development and evaluation. Research Paper RMRS-RP-4 Revised. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. p 47 https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-RP-4

32
Finney MA (2006) An overview of FlamMap fire modelling capabilities. In: Andrews, P.L., Butler, B.W. (Eds.), Fuels Management-How to Measure Success. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Proceedings RMRS-P-41, pp. 213–220.

33
Fitch RA, Kim YS, Waltz AEM, Crouse JE. Changes in potential wildland fire suppression costs due to restoration treatments in northern arizona ponderosa pine forests. For Policy Econ, 2018, 87: 101-114,

DOI

34
Fu X, Lidar A, Kantar M, Raghavan B. Edible fire buffers: mitigation of wildfire with multifunctional landscapes. Biorxiv, 2021,

DOI

35
Galizia LF, Alcasena F, Prata G, Rodrigues M. Assessing expected economic losses from wildfires in eucalypt plantations of western Brazil. For Policy Econ, 2021, 125,

DOI

36
Gomes Da Costa H, De Rigo D, Liberta G, Durrant T, San-Miguel-Ayanz J. European wildfire danger and vulnerability in a changing climate: towards integrating risk dimensions. Public Off European Un, Luxemb, 2020,

DOI

37
Jahdi R, Salis M, Alcasena FJ, Arabi M, Arca B, Duce P. Evaluating landscape-scale wildfire exposure in northwestern Iran. Nat Hazards, 2020, 101(3): 911-932,

DOI

38
Loudermilk EL, Stanton A, Scheller RM, Dilts TE, Weisberg PJ, Skinner C, Yang J. Effectiveness of fuel treatments for mitigating wildfire risk and sequestering forest carbon: A case study in the lake tahoe basin. For Ecol Manage, 2014, 323: 114-125,

DOI

39
Mallinis G, Mitsopoulos I, Beltran E, Goldamer JG. Assessing wildfire risk in cultural heritage properties using high spatial and temporal resolution satellite imagery and spatially explicit fire simulations: the case of holy mount athos. Greece Forests, 2016, 7(2): 46,

DOI

40
Marino E, Hernando C, Madrigal J, Guijarro M. Short-term effect of fuel treatments on fire behavior in a mixed heathland: a comparative assessment in an outdoor wind tunnel. Int J Wildland Fire, 2014, 23(8): 1097-1107,

DOI

41
Marshall G, Thompson DK, Anderson K, Simpson B, Linn R, Schroeder D. The Impact of fuel treatments on wildfire behavior in north American boreal fuels: A simulation study using FIRETEC. Fire, 2020, 3(2): 18,

DOI

42
Mercer DE, Haigth RG, Prestemon JP. Holmes TP, Prestemon JP, Abt KL. Analyzing trade-offs between fuels management, suppression, and damages from wildfire. The Economics of Forest Disturbances: Management, Suppression and Damages from Wildfire Series Forestry Sciences, 2008 Dordrecht Springer

43
Miller C, Ager AA. A review of recent advances in risk analysis for wildfire management. Int J Wildland Fire, 2013, 22(1): 1-14,

DOI

44
Mirra IM, Oliveira TM, Barros AMG, Fernandes PM. Fuel dynamics following fire hazard reduction treatments in blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus) plantations in Portugal. For Ecol Manage, 2017, 398: 185-195,

DOI

45
Molina JR, Ortega M, Rodríguez y Silva F. Useful life of prescribed fires in a southern mediterranean basin: An application to pinus pinaster stands in the sierra morena range. Forests, 2021, 12(4): 486,

DOI

46
Moreira F, Ascoli D, Safford H, Adams MA, Moreno JM, Pereira JMC, Catry FX, Armesto J, Bond W, González ME, Curt T, Koutsias N, McCaw L, Price O, Pausas JG, Rigolot E, Stephens S, Tavsanoglu C, Vallejo VR, Van Wilgen BW, Xanthopoulos G, Fernandes PM. Wildfire management in Mediterranean-type regions: paradigm change needed. Environ Res Lett, 2020, 15(1): ,

DOI

47
Moritz MA, Moody TJ, Krawchuk MA, Hughes M, Hall A. Spatial variation in extreme winds predicts large wildfire locations in chaparral ecosystems. Geophys Res Lett, 2010, 37(4): L04801,

DOI

48
Nelson RM Jr. Prediction of diurnal change in 10-h fuel stick moisture content. Can J for Res, 2000, 30(7): 1071-1087,

DOI

49
Oliveira TM, Barros AMG, Ager AA, Fernandes PM. Assessing the effect of a fuel break network to reduce burnt area and wildfire risk transmission. Int J Wildland Fire, 2016, 25(6): 619-632,

DOI

50
Oliveira U, Soares-Filho B, de Souza Costa WL, Gomes L, Bustamante M, Miranda H. Modeling fuel loads dynamics and fire spread probability in the Brazilian cerrado. For Ecol Manage, 2021, 482,

DOI

51
Palaiologou P, Ager AA, Nielsen-Pincus M, Evers CR, Kalabokidis K. Using transboundary wildfire exposure assessments to improve fire management programs: a case study in greece. Int J Wildland Fire, 2018, 27(8): 501-513,

DOI

52
Palaiologou P, Kalabokidis K, Ager AA, Day MA. Development of comprehensive fuel management strategies for reducing wildfire risk in greece. Forests, 2020, 11(8): 789,

DOI

53
Palaiologou P, Kalabokidis K, Ager AA, Galatsidas S, Papalampros L, Day MA. Spatial optimization and trade-offs of alternative forest management scenarios in macedonia. Greece Forests, 2021, 12(6): 697,

DOI

54
Parisien MA, Kafka VG, Hirsch KG, Todd JB, Lavoie SG, Maczek PD (2005) Mapping wildfire susceptibility with the BURN-P3 simulation model. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta. Information Report NOR-X-405, p 36

55
Pellizzaro G, Duce P, Ventura A, Zara P. Seasonal variations of live moisture content and ignitability in shrubs of the mediterranean basin. Int J Wildland Fire, 2007, 16(5): 633-641,

DOI

56
Pellizzaro G, Ventura A, Zara P (2005) Influence of seasonal weather variations on fuel status for some shrubs typical of Mediterranean Basin. In: Proceeding’s 6th Fire and Forest Meteorology Symposium and 19th Interior West Fire Council Meeting, 24e27 Canmore, AB, Canada

57
Peratoner G, Vitalone L, Pramsohler M, Kasal A (2017) Effect of irrigation and N fertilization on the botanical composition of mountain meadows. Grassland Science in Europe, Vol. 22 – Grassland resources for extensive farming systems in marginal lands: major drivers and future scenarios. Proceedings of the 19th Symposium of the European Grassland Federation Alghero, Italy 7–10 681.

58
Pinto A, Fernandes PM, Loureiro C (2014) Prescribed burning guide for Blue Gum plantations. GIFF SA/University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro. Vila Real, Portugal. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3313.5688.

59
Rideout D, Wei Y, Kirsch A, Botti S. Holmes TP, Prestemon JP, Abt KL. Toward a unified economic theory of fire program analysis with strategies for empirical modeling. The Economics of Forest Disturbances, 2008 Dordrecht Springer

60
Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. Res. Pap. INT-115. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 40 p. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/32533

61
Rothermel RC (1991) Predicting behaviour and size of crown fires in the northern rocky mountains. Res. Pap. INT-RP-438. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 46 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/INT-RP-438

62
Safford HD, Schmidt DA, Carlson CH. Effects of fuel treatments on fire severity in an area of wildland–urban interface, angora fire, lake tahoe basin. California for Ecol Manage, 2009, 258(5): 773-787,

DOI

63
Salis M, Ager AA, Arca B, Finney MA, Bacciu V, Duce P, Spano D. Assessing exposure of human and ecological values to wildfire in Sardinia. Italy Int J Wildland Fire, 2013, 22(4): 549-565,

DOI

64
Salis M, Ager AA, Alcasena FJ, Arca B, Finney MA, Pellizzaro G, Spano D. Analysing seasonal patterns of wildfire exposure factors in Sardinia. Italy Environ Monit Assess, 2015, 187(1): 1-20,

DOI

65
Salis M, Laconi M, Ager AA, Alcasena FJ, Arca B, Lozano OM, Oliveira AS, Spano D. Evaluating alternative fuel treatment strategies to reduce wildfire losses in a mediterranean area. For Ecol Manage, 2016, 368: 207-221,

DOI

66
Salis M, Del Giudice L, Arca B, Ager AA, Alcasena FJ, Lozano O, Bacciu V, Spano D, Duce P. Modelling the effects of different fuel treatment mosaics on wildfire spread and behaviour in a Mediterranean agropastoral area. J Environ Manage, 2018, 212: 490-505,

DOI

67
Salis M, Arca B, Del Giudice L, Palaiologou P, Alcasena-Urdiroz F, Ager AA, Fiori M, Pellizzaro G, Scarpa C, Schirru M, Ventura A, Casula M, Duce P. Application of simulation modelling for wildfire exposure and transmission assessment in Sardinia. Italy Int J Disaster Risk Reduct, 2021, 58,

DOI

68
Schmidt DA, Taylor AH, Skinner CN. The influence of fuels treatment and landscape arrangement on simulated fire behaviour, southern cascade range, california. For Ecol Manage, 2008, 255: 3170-3184,

DOI

69
Scott JH, Burgan R (2005) Standard fire behaviour fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-153. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 72 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-GTR-153

70
Scott JH, Reinhardt ED (2001) Assessing crown fire potential by linking models of surface and crown fire behaviour. Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-29. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 59 https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-RP-29

71
Thompson MP, Calkin DE, Gilbertson-Day JW, Ager AA. Advancing effects analysis for integrated, large-scale wildfire risk assessment. Environ Monit Assess, 2011, 179(1): 217-239,

DOI

72
Thompson MP, Vaillant NM, Haas JR, Gebert KM, Stockmann KD. Quantifying the potential impacts of fuel treatments on wildfire suppression costs. J for, 2013, 111: 49-58,

DOI

73
Thompson MP, Riley KL, Loeffler D, Haas JR. Modelling fuel treatment leverage: encounter rates, risk reduction, and suppression cost impacts. Forests, 2017, 8(12): 469,

DOI

74
Vaillant NM, Fites-Kaufman JA, Stephens SL. Effectiveness of prescribed fire as a fuel treatment in Californian coniferous forests. Int J Wildland Fire, 2009, 18(2): 165-175,

DOI

75
Van Wagner CE. Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire. Can J for Res, 1977, 7(1): 23-24,

DOI

76
Xofis P, Tsiourlis G, Konstantinidis PA. Fire danger index for the early detection of areas vulnerable to wildfires in the eastern mediterranean region. EMJE, 2020, 5(2): 1-13,

DOI

Options
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]