整合生物学期刊网

林业研究(英文版) >

2023 , Vol. 34 >Issue 1: 177 - 186

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01495-0

  • Tiago de Sousa Leite 1, 3, a ,
  • Rômulo Magno Oliveira de Freitas 2 ,
  • Nildo da Silva Dias 3 ,
  • Jeferson Luiz Dallabona Dombroski 3 ,
  • Narjara Walessa Nogueira 3
展开

收稿日期: 2021-07-05

  录用日期: 2021-11-09

  网络出版日期: 2024-10-16

收起

The interplay between leaf water potential and osmotic adjustment on photosynthetic and growth parameters of tropical dry forest trees

  • Tiago de Sousa Leite 1, 3, a ,
  • Rômulo Magno Oliveira de Freitas 2 ,
  • Nildo da Silva Dias 3 ,
  • Jeferson Luiz Dallabona Dombroski 3 ,
  • Narjara Walessa Nogueira 3
Expand
  • 1 Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá MT, Brazil
  • 2 Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Norte, Pau dos Ferros RN, Brazil
  • 3 Federal Rural University of the Semi-Arid Region, Mossoró RN, Brazil
a

Received date: 2021-07-05

  Accepted date: 2021-11-09

  Online published: 2024-10-16

Copyright

© Northeast Forestry University 2022. corrected publication 2022
Fold

本文引用格式

Tiago de Sousa Leite , Rômulo Magno Oliveira de Freitas , Nildo da Silva Dias , Jeferson Luiz Dallabona Dombroski , Narjara Walessa Nogueira . [J]. 林业研究(英文版), 2023 , 34(1) : 177 -186 . DOI: 10.1007/s11676-022-01495-0

Abstract

Mimosa tenuiflora and Piptadenia stipulacea are commonly accepted as drought-tolerant species but little is known about their response to drought followed by rehydration. Therefore, the interplay between leaf water potential and osmotic adjustment on photosynthetic and growth parameters of these species was examined. A greenhouse study was conducted in a split-plot design with two water conditions in the main plots (control; drought followed by rehydration), and eight sampling times in the subplots (1, 4 and 7 days of drought, and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 17 days of rehydration). Plant water status and biochemical changes were assessed as well as leaf gas exchange and subsequent growth. Under drought stress, both species maintained a low leaf water potential throughout the day by accumulating compatible solutes, thus allowing a rapid and full recovery of water status when rehydrated. Although these plants minimized water loss by closing their stomata, neither showed stomatal limitations to photosynthesis. The inhibition of this process during drought was possibly related to mesophyll limitations as well as to a reversible downregulation of photosystems, along with adjustments of their stoichiometry. Water deficits also triggered morphological adaptations at the whole plant level, leading to reduced growth, mainly of the shoots in M. tenuiflora and the roots in P. stipulacea.

Key words： Drought stress; Rehydration; Gas exchange; Plant biomass

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序
1
Alves FJB, Freire ALO. Gas exchange of Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd.) poiret under water deficit and rewatering. J Agric Stud, 2019, 7(4): 297-308

2
Antezana-Vera SA, Marenco RA. Sap flow rates of Minquartia guianensis in central Amazonia during the prolonged dry season of 2015–2016. J for Res, 2021, 32(5): 2067-2076,

DOI

3
Ashraf M, Harris PJC. Photosynthesis under stressful environments: an overview. Photosynthetica, 2013, 51(2): 163-190,

DOI

4
Barros JPA, Souza LSB, Silva TGF, Moura MSB, Silva LF. Partitioning and modeling of biomass in caatinga legume seedlings in different water conditions. Floresta Ambient, 2019, 26(4): ,

DOI

5
Barros V, Melo A, Santos M, Nogueira L, Frosi G, Santos MG. Different resource-use strategies of invasive and native woody species from a seasonally dry tropical forest under drought stress and recovery. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2020, 147: 181-190,

DOI

6
Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil, 1973, 39(1): 205-207,

DOI

7
Benedito CP, Ribeiro MCC, Torres SB, Guimarães IP, Oliveira KJB. Overcome dormancy, temperatures and substrates on germination of Mimosa tenuiflora Willd seeds. Semin-Cienc Agrar, 2017, 38(1): 125-134,

DOI

8
Benedito CP, Ribeiro MCC, Paiva EP, Medeiros HLS. Dormancy overcoming and germination test in Piptadenia stipulacea (Benth.) ducke seeds. Rev Cienc Agron, 2019, 50(2): 338-344,

DOI

9
Bueno A, Pritsch K, Simon J. Responses of native and invasive woody seedlings to combined competition and drought are species-specific. Tree Physiol, 2021, 41(3): 343-357,

DOI

10
Campos DA, Andrade EM, Castanho ADA, Feitosa RC, Palácio HQA. Biomass dynamics in a fragment of Brazilian tropical forest (caatinga) over consecutive dry years. Appl Sci, 2020, 10(21): 7813,

DOI

11
Choat B, Brodribb TJ, Brodersen CR, Duursma RA, Lopez R, Medlyn BE. Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature, 2018, 558: 531-539,

DOI

12
Dietrich L, Kahmen A. Water relations of drought-stressed temperate trees benefit from short drought-intermitting rainfall events. Agric Meteorol, 2019, 265: 70-77,

DOI

13
Dombroski JLD, Praxedes SC, Freitas RMO, Pontes FM. Water relations of caatinga trees in the dry season. S Afr J Bot, 2011, 77(2): 430-434,

DOI

14
Dombroski JLD, Freitas RMO, Tomczak VE, Pinto JRS, Farias RM. Ecophysiology of water stressed Handroanthus impetiginosus (Mart. ex. DC) Mattos) seedlings. Sci for, 2014, 42(101): 155-163

15
Duan HL, Wang DF, Wei XH, Huang GM, Fan HB, Zhou SX, Wu JP, Liu WF, Tissue DT, Wan SZ. The decoupling between gas exchange and water potential of Cinnamomum camphora seedlings during drought recovery and its relation to ABA accumulation in leaves. J Plant Ecol, 2020, 13(6): 683-692,

DOI

16
DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem, 1956, 28(3): 350-356,

DOI

17
Elferjani R, Benomar L, Momayyezi M, Tognetti R, Niinemets Ü, Soolanayakanahally RY, Théroux-Rancourt G, Tosens T, Ripullone F, Bilodeau-Gauthier S, Lamhamedi MS, Calfapietra C, Lamara M. A meta-analysis of mesophyll conductance to CO2 in relation to major abiotic stresses in poplar species. J Exp Bot, 2021, 72(12): 4384-4400,

DOI

18
Eziz A, Yan Z, Tian D, Han WX, Tang ZY, Fang JY. Drought effect on plant biomass allocation: a meta-analysis. Ecol Evol, 2017, 7(24): 11002-11010,

DOI

19
Falqueto AR, Silva Júnior RA, Gomes MTG, Martins JPR, Silva DM, Partelli PL. Effects of drought stress on chlorophyll a fluorescence in two rubber tree clones. Sci Hortic, 2017, 224: 238-243,

DOI

20
Fox H, Doron-Faigenboim A, Kelly G, Bourstein R, Attia Z, Zhou J, Moshe Y, Moshelion M, David-Schwartz R. Transcriptome analysis of Pinus halepensis under drought stress and during recovery. Tree Physiol, 2018, 38(3): 423-441,

DOI

21
Freitas VMB, Scalon SPQ, Dresch DM, Bastos SS, Souza APR. Influence of exogenous application of abscisic acid on gas exchanges in Hymenaea courbaril L (Fabaceae) seedlings subjected to water deficit. Floresta, 2018, 48(2): 163-172,

DOI

22
Frosi G, Barros VA, Oliveira MT, Santos M, Ramos DG, Maia LC, Santos MG. Symbiosis with AMF and leaf Pi supply increases water deficit tolerance of woody species from seasonal dry tropical forest. J Plant Physiol, 2016, 207: 84-93,

DOI

23
Gallé A, Feller U. Changes of photosynthetic traits in beech saplings (Fagus sylvatica) under severe drought stress and during recovery. Physiol Plant, 2007, 131(3): 412-421,

DOI

24
Gallé A, Haldimann P, Feller U. Photosynthetic performance and water relations in young pubescent oak (Quercus pubescens) trees during drought stress and recovery. New Phytol, 2007, 174(4): 799-810,

DOI

25
Gomes FP, Oliva MA, Mielke MS, Almeida AAF, Leite HG, Aquino LA. Photosynthetic limitations in leaves of young Brazilian Green Dwarf coconut (Cocos nucifera L ‘nana’) palm under well-watered conditions or recovering from drought stress. Environ Exp Bot, 2008, 62(3): 195-204,

DOI

26
Haider MS, Kurjogi MM, Khalil-ur-Rehman M, Pervez T, Songtao J, Fiaz M, Jogaiah S, Wang C, Fang J. Drought stress revealed physiological, biochemical and gene-expressional variations in Yoshihime peach (Prunus persica L) cultivar. J Plant Interact, 2018, 13(1): 83-90,

DOI

27
Hu Y, Wang B, Hu TX, Chen H, Li H, Zhang W, Zhong Y, Hu HL. Combined action of an antioxidant defence system and osmolytes on drought tolerance and post-drought recovery of Phoebe zhennan S Lee Saplings. Acta Physiol Plant, 2015, 37(4): 84,

DOI

28
Jiao PP, Wu ZH, Wang X, Jiang ZB, Wang YQ, Liu H, Qin R, Li ZJ. Short-term transcriptomic responses of Populus euphratica roots and leaves to drought stress. J for Res, 2021, 32(2): 841-853,

DOI

29
Karimi S, Yadollahi A, Arzani K, Imani A, Aghaalikhani M. Gas-exchange response of almond genotypes to water stress. Photosynthetica, 2015, 53(1): 29-34,

DOI

30
Khaleghi A, Naderi R, Brunetti C, Maserti BE, Salami SA, Babalar M. Morphological, physiochemical and antioxidant responses of Maclura pomifera to drought stress. Sci Rep, 2019, 9: 19250,

DOI

31
Liao T, Wang Y, Xu CP, Li Y, Kang XY. Adaptive photosynthetic and physiological responses to drought and rewatering in triploid Populus populations. Photosynthetica, 2018, 56(2): 578-590,

DOI

32
Lichtenthaler HK. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol, 1987, 148: 350-382,

DOI

33
Lima AT, Meiado MV. Effect of hydration and dehydration cycles on Mimosa tenuiflora seeds during germination and initial development. S Afr J Bot, 2018, 116: 164-167,

DOI

34
Liu CC, Liu YG, Guo K, Fan DY, Li GQ, Zheng YR, Yu LF, Yang R. Effect of drought on pigments, osmotic adjustment and antioxidant enzymes in six woody plant species in karst habitats of southwestern China. Environ Exp Bot, 2011, 71(2): 174-183,

DOI

35
Niinemets Ü. Uncovering the hidden facets of drought stress: secondary metabolites make the difference. Tree Physiol, 2016, 36(2): 129-132

36
Peguero-Pina JJ, Mendoza-Herrer Ó, Gil-Pelegrín E, Sancho-Knapik D. Cavitation limits the recovery of gas exchange after severe drought stress in holm oak (Quercus ilex L.). Forests, 2018, 9(8): 443,

DOI

37
Pritzkow C, Szota C, Williamson VG, Arndt SK. Phenotypic plasticity of drought tolerance traits in a widespread eucalypt (Eucalyptus obliqua). Forests, 2020, 11(12): 1371,

DOI

38
Ruehr NK, Grote R, Mayr S, Arneth A. Beyond the extreme: recovery of carbon and water relations in woody plants following heat and drought stress. Tree Physiol, 2019, 39(8): 1285-1299,

DOI

39
Sampaio EVSB. Medina E, Mooney HA, Bullock SH. Overview of the Brazilian caatinga. Seasonally dry tropical forests, 1995 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 35-63,

DOI

40
Santiago LS, Bonal D, De Guzman ME, Ávila-Lovera E. Goldstein G, Santiago L. Drought survival strategies of tropical trees. Tropical tree physiology, 2016 Cham Springer 243-258,

DOI

41
Santiago AMP, Nogueira RJMC, Lopes EC. Crescimento em plantas jovens de Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth., cultivadas sob estresse hídrico. Ecossistema, 2001, 26(1): 23-30

42
Schimpl FC, Ferreira MJ, Jaquetti RK, Martins SCV, Goncalves JFC. Physiological responses of young Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) plants to drought stress and subsequent rewatering. Flora, 2019, 252: 10-17,

DOI

43
Serra-Maluquer X, Mencuccini M, Martínez-Vilalta J. Changes in tree resistance, recovery and resilience across three successive extreme droughts in the northeast Iberian Peninsula. Oecologia, 2018, 187(1): 343-354,

DOI

44
Silva EC, Silva MFA, Nogueira RJMC, Albuquerque MB. Growth evaluation and water relations of Erythrina velutina seedlings in response to drought stress. Braz J Plant Physiol, 2010, 22(4): 225-233,

DOI

45
Spieß N, Oufir M, Matušíková I, Stierschneider M, Kopecky D, Homolka A, Burg K, Fluch S, Hausman JF, Wilhelm E. Ecophysiological and transcriptomic responses of oak (Quercus robur) to long-term drought exposure and rewatering. Environ Exp Bot, 2012, 77: 117-126,

DOI

46
Stan KD, Sanchez-Azofeifa A, Duran SM, Guzmán QJA, Hesketh M, Laakso K, Portillo-Quintero C, Rankine C, Doetterl S. Tropical dry forest resilience and water use efficiency: an analysis of productivity under climate change. Environ Res Lett, 2021, 16(5): ,

DOI

47
Suresh K, Nagamani C, Kantha DL, Kumar MK. Changes in photosynthetic activity in five common hybrids of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) seedlings under water deficit. Photosynthetica, 2012, 50(4): 549-556,

DOI

48
Taiz L, Zeiger E, Møller IM, Murphy A. Plant physiology and development, 2015 Sunderland Sinauer Associates Inc 761

49
Thammanu S, Marod D, Han H, Bhusal N, Asanok L, Ketdee P, Gaewsingha N, Lee S, Chung J. The influence of environmental factors on species composition and distribution in a community forest in Northern Thailand. J for Res, 2021, 32(2): 649-662,

DOI

50
Xu Z, Zhou G, Shimizu H. Plant responses to drought and rewatering. Plant Signal Behav, 2010, 5(6): 649-654,

DOI

51
Yemm EW, Cocking EC, Ricketts RE. The determination of amino-acids with ninhydrin. Analyst, 1955, 80(948): 209-214,

DOI

52
Yordanov I, Velikova V, Tsonev T. Plant responses to drought, acclimation, and stress tolerance. Photosynthetica, 2000, 38(2): 171-186,

DOI

53
Zargar SM, Gupta N, Nazir M, Mahajan R, Malik FA, Sofi NR, Shikari AB, Salgotra RK. Impact of drought on photosynthesis: molecular perspective. Plant Gene, 2017, 11(Part B): 154-159,

DOI

54
Zhou S, Medlyn B, Sabaté S, Sperlich D, Prentice IC, Whitehead D. Short-term water stress impacts on stomatal, mesophyll and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis differ consistently among tree species from contrasting climates. Tree Physiol, 2014, 34(10): 1035-1046,

DOI

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

版权所有 © 《林业研究(英文版)》编辑部
技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司