整合生物学期刊网

林业研究(英文版) ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 98-.DOI: 10.1007/s11676-024-01748-0

• • 上一篇    下一篇

Saeed Solaymani1,a, Andrew Dunningham1   

  • 收稿日期:2023-11-30 接受日期:2024-03-03 出版日期:2024-10-16 发布日期:2024-10-16
  • 通讯作者: Saeed Solaymani

Impacts of forest plantation programs on sectoral CO2 emissions regionally in New Zealand

Saeed Solaymani1,a, Andrew Dunningham1   

  1. 1 Scion, Rotorua, New Zealand
  • Received:2023-11-30 Accepted:2024-03-03 Online:2024-10-16 Published:2024-10-16
  • Contact: Saeed Solaymani
  • Supported by:
    New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited

Abstract:

Investing in projects that support environmental benefits, such as tree harvesting, has the potential to reduce air pollution levels in the atmosphere in the future. However, this kind of investment may increase the current level of emissions. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate how much the policy affects the current level of CO2 emissions. This makes sure the policy doesn’t increase the level of CO2 emissions. This study aims to analyze the effect of the One Billion Trees program on CO2 emissions in New Zealand by employing the 2020 input–output table analysis. This investigation examines the direct and indirect effects of policy on both the demand and supply sides across six regions of New Zealand. The results of this study for the first year of plantation suggest that the policy increases the level of CO2 emissions in all regions, especially in the Waikato region. The direct and indirect impact of the policy leads to 64 kt of CO2 emissions on the demand side and 270 kt of CO2 emissions on the supply side. These lead to 0.19 and 0.74% of total CO2 emissions being attributed to investment shocks. Continuing the policy is recommended, as it has a low effect on CO2 emissions. However, it is crucial to prioritize the use of low-carbon machinery that uses fossil fuels during the plantation process.

Key words: Regional input–output analysis, Forest investment program, Sectoral CO2 emissions, Environmental policies, Supply-side policy, Demand-side policy